Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall
Search engine marketing work, almost every time need to rebuild the site.
There are many reasons: for example, "when building a website without keyword analysis steps", "There are a large number of functional modules need to add" ...
Site reconstruction by everyone is considered a "reborn", "Salted fish" important step. Indeed, after the reconstruction of the site completely changed the appearance, whether to the superior, or customers are very face.
But why do very few people mention "website reconstruction"?
Because many practitioners believe that a website is changed to DIV:
1. There is no need
2. Too Much trouble
The reason "unnecessary" is interesting.
It seems to be asking "why change to div"? In fact, this question is wrong. What is a div? is division, is the area, the meaning of the block. When the HTML code appears, the DIV tag is used to make the page layout. We now do Web sites, build websites, but most use table to build frames, do page layout. What is table? Table is the meaning of the table, the table should only appear when the output data, input data as a table, form. So it's a big joke to use a table to make a page layout.
Refactoring a Web site is not only necessary, but also reasonable, you can lie on the couch to sleep, and can sleep soundly, but your mother will teach you should sleep in bed, there is no reason, you should be in bed to sleep.
"Too troublesome" is a reason to understand.
We have done a lot of web site refactoring, so that it is basically in line with the standard. Why is the basic fit? Because the standards of the consortium are changing and browsers support the latest standards differently.
The effort to refactor a website is amazing, and I think it's about developing a website. Because every bit of improvement, it is necessary to test different browsers (ie, Firefox, Opera), and different versions (IE 7.0 6.0 5.0 firefox1.5 1.0) compatibility issues. And you have to open 3 computers, a computer can not see the same browser different versions of the effect.
The more site elements, the more problems arise, we have in order to refactor 200 pages, spent 1 months! In short, refactoring a website is very troublesome, really too troublesome.
Do we have to do website refactoring?
To be sure, the reconstructed Web site code is more beautiful and smaller in size. If you are an English web site, you can submit a refactored site to a list of "div sites" so you can get a lot of extra links over your competitors. Second, your site is smaller, load, browse faster, and improve the user experience is also good.
Basically can say, if you give a foreigner to do a website, he will certainly ask your work is div. If you make a website for Chinese people, no one will ask you to conform to Div.
For us, if we start our own project quickly, we will not take div into account. If our projects are carried out abroad, it will take 1 months, 2 months to build a website that meets the standards of Web pages.
In fact, we can notice that Google does not have a standard Web page, the true standard of the page is really very small.
So when it comes to the end, sleeping on the couch, you need to weigh and choose for yourself.