Ren: a mechanism to encourage the creation of generals

China cannot create value, the first is the lack of soil, the soil is the system of property rights protection. In Silicon Valley, everyone worked so hard to work overtime that they could get rich overnight. I have a friend, when I went to the United States, his company is bigger than Huawei, he held the idea of a rich night, more than 20 years also not wealthy. But millions of Americans like him may struggle for a lifetime, and may squeeze someone's success, such as Mr. Zuckerberg. In other words, the property protection system, so that everyone saw the "overnight rich" possibility. The impulses of innovation are suppressed by the lack of ownership protection of the different armies. There is nothing remarkable about Facebook, but if it appears in China, it may be copied more than once, and not only will the creator be discarded, but the first copycat will be destroyed. But in the United States have a strict intellectual property protection system, you can not copy, you copy the penalty you billions of dollars. Such a strict system of protection, everyone knows not to arbitrarily violate others. In fact, the protection of intellectual property is our own needs, not others to suppress our means, if we recognize this, decades, hundreds of years after the national science and technology have hope. Science and technology is not a problem of quick success, a breakthrough in theory, constitute the contribution of social value, it takes twenty or thirty years. Jacob broke through the CDMA era in the 60 's, when we were in the Cultural Revolution. How can we see Qualcomm to make money, and sigh how we are not Qualcomm? Twenty or thirty years ago we were engaged in "Vinger", Qualcomm CEO that time, popular who read who is stupid, so we today calm down, do something, or maybe forty or fifty years later we have hope. But now we can't calm down. Chinese university professors, compared with the number of papers, but can not produce so much to be copied, copy the paper can also have what innovation to win the Nobel Prize? What we have to change is the academic environment. In our company's innovation problem, first, must emphasize the value theory, is not for the innovation and the innovation, must be in order to create the value. But the future value point is still a hypothetical system, now is not clear. Let's say what the future is, we're assuming that the pipeline of data traffic will be thicker and become as thick as the Pacific, and that it is not clear whether this assumption is accurate. If it's really as thick as the Pacific, maybe Huawei is betting on the treasure. If only the Yangtze River, the Yellow River is so thick, then Huawei will not be finished? The world's most screwed up companies, Nortel is betting on the wrong. China's small netcom is also betting the wrong treasure, postponed early. Small Netcom Just died, broadband came. Heroes are often untimely. Some people are very strong personality, we do not agree, if born in the era of resistance to war may be heroes, perhaps as a general. We are based on the needs and values of human society, assuming that the future flow of data will be larger, but this does not necessarily conform to social law. The assumption of Marx's theory was that there were no cars and no airplanes, he saidWhat is the exact definition of substance? Because Marx didn't come up with the standard mathematical formula, we thought there was a higher standard. So our assumption now is to accept long-term criticism, and if it's not, we need to fix it. The chief scientist decided to lead us to a breakthrough. Second, on the issue of innovation, we should be more tolerant of failure. Tolerance failure also has a specific evaluation mechanism, not all areas allow large-scale failure. We are a high-end research area, fuzzy areas more. Some areas are not vague, they do not allow them to make a mess, such as project contracting and so can be clearly quantified, do not explain the low management capacity. But we're going into a fuzzy area, and we don't know what it's going to be like in the future. Therefore, in the mind to put more open, you can go outside to drink coffee, and people thought collision, write your regrets, sent to the Internet, leading a generation of new thinking. Maybe it's not just Huawei that sees you, and society sees you. When your feelings can affect others, others follow the way down, maybe he succeeded. So in the innovation issue, more is a kind of continuity. As a scientist, you may not see the predictions of human beings in the end, but I don't think that's necessarily a mistake. The Chinese Wu Zhonghua, for example, wrote the equation for three-dimensional flow of turbo-machinery in the 50 's and published the paper. Britain did the first generation of Spey engines according to this theory. After smashing the "gang", Deng Xiaoping visited Britain and asked us if we could introduce production, and the British said yes, Xiaoping was happy and stood up and saluted the British scientists. And all the scientists in Britain stood up and saluted China because the technology was invented in China. At this time Wu Zhonghua is in Hubei Conte Pig. Another example is Hanyu Pinyin. In 1979, Zhou, a professor at Fudan University, thought he would be invited to the International Organization for Standardization to state the Chinese view of words. Before the plane, the unit told him that because you are invited by the foreign party, the unit is not responsible for all travel expenses. So he went to Paris without a penny subsidy. He spent three years trying to get the phonetic text to be used in China from the International Organization for Standardization. Otherwise, our Chinese characters will not be able to integrate into the computer age. Therefore, to constitute a breakthrough, it will take a few generations to pay great efforts. Now everywhere is discussing the question of independent innovation, I particularly disagree, why must autonomy? Autonomy is the feudal inward-looking. Why do we have to be exclusive? Can we do anything better than the others? We emphasize that we should only do our best in the process of innovation, and that the other part should be more open and cooperative, only in this way can we build up the real strategic force. I am very supportive of the emergence of innovation, but in the company's channel good. Therefore, it is important to avoid the establishment of a closed system, but to establish an open systems, especially the hardware system should be more open. To be closed is to die. To encourage the creation of a general the Huawei from the thirty or forty analog switch agents to this day, inGeneral You's long-term vision. Why don't we have a general now? It is the problem of cultural mechanism and assessment mechanism. Hu (Senior vice chairman of Huawei) said that our benefit mechanism should be changed from "Grant" to "get". The award is the top of our assessment, how much should you give him how much money. Later we change to "get", "share", will give the whole evaluation mechanism upside down, with interest as the center. Why our organ is so large, because the organ to separate money, the organ first to leave a piece, their hair is good, wages also rose well, the rest of the brothers in Afghanistan, the results they do not get much. This is a mechanism that does not encourage the creation of a hero and does not produce a strategic mechanism, so we now have to adjust. In this transitional period of adjustment, we call for more strategic vision of people to come to management positions. We look at the long-term problem, we are today to gamble, gambling is strategic vision. What are we betting on? The pipe will be as thick as the Pacific. Is it possible for us to achieve the Pacific flow system? For example, Airbus and Boeing compete, Boeing assumes the world is a network of the world, point-to-point flight, so do not need a hub to transfer to all small cities, so Boeing did not make a big airliner, Boeing in the small point of the point of improvement, Do a point-to-point flight. Airbus assumed the "pivot" type, to Frankfurt first by a large plane, and then a small plane, so 300 of people's aircraft was first published. For example, currently in the Terminal OS domain, Android, IOS, Windows Phone8 pillars, the formation of their own biosphere, left to other terminal OS has been very small opportunities. If these three operating systems give Huawei an equal right, then our operating system is not needed. If they suddenly break our grain, the Android system doesn't work for me, and the Windows Phone 8 system doesn't work for us, is it stupid? Again, when we were making high-end chips, I didn't object to you buying high-end chips from America. I think you should try to understand it as much as possible with their high-end chips. Only when they do not sell us, our things are a little bit close, but we have to make up for it. We cannot have a narrow sense of pride that will kill us. We do the operating system, and do high-end chip is the same truth. The main is to let others allow us to use, rather than cut off our food. When the food is broken, the backup system needs to be available. Therefore, if there is no clear view of short-term investments and long-term interests, he is not, in fact, a general. The general must have a sense of strategy. Huawei is in fact in a relatively good period, to increase investment, to dissipate these advantages, to form a new advantage. The whole society is in recession, the economy may be in a cycle of recession, although we have fallen compared with our past, but with the next to live very well, our net profit this year will be 2 billion ~30 billion. Therefore, investment in the future does notcan be soft. We don't dare to spend money because we lack leaders, we lack generals, we lack strategies for the future. Huawei, for example, has the advantage of mathematical logic, not the physical interface. Huawei must focus on its strengths. So in the field of materials science, I tend to be more inclined to research on material applications, rather than creating inventions on materials. Japan is shrinking from the whole machine to the parts, from the parts to the material, which is a great time for us to do material science, and we study how to use these things to make products better than the United States. We all think that Japanese and German machines are reliable, let the Japanese and Germans do our intermediate tests to check the quality of our products. Good or bad for Japanese employees, German employees to define. China's religion is metaphysics, is fuzzy science, to create the invention has the advantage, but does not necessarily have the benefit to make the reliable product. From this point of view, we have a complementary economic relationship with the world and a lot of friends to help us achieve our major strategic goals. Unified philosophy is the cornerstone of innovation in the last century 560 's film actor is not money, I have heard in the early 80, our central top star Liu Huan, Wang Gang, and so on from Beijing to Taiyuan concert, walk once can earn how much money? Earn 20 Yuan. But how can it be said that they have no contribution to the culture of the Chinese nation? What's our biggest feeling about going to Russia? It is Pushkin, Turgenev, Tolstoy, these people! Russia is a cultural power and its culture has an impact on the whole region. These two days to see Wang Guowei's TV series, Wang Guowei is Mr. Lu Xun scold "not ashamed of human dog heap", today looked back to see this person's philosophy is very great, when Zhang Zhidong to open a mine, run a factory, Li Hongzhang to engage in Westernization, Wang Guowei said: "The rejuvenation of the motherland to rely on philosophy." However, he was thrown into the garbage heap of history, and finally threw himself into the lake, suicide. China has two painful souls, formerly said the most painful soul is Lu Xun, now take a step forward, Wang Guowei is also China's most painful soul. Wang Guowei's philosophy can change China. Britain, the United States, Japan, France, Germany and the entire European society, they have made clear in the philosophy system, hundreds of years no unrest. And our policy for a while left, a moment right, that is, from top to bottom in the values of no unity, philosophical views are not unified. China should first engage in philosophy, to transform people's thinking, the state can have a new mechanism and system, Wang Guowei was a "not ashamed of the human heap of crap", now we think he is very great. There is also a great person Li Hongzhang, Li Hongzhang is also "not ashamed of the people of the heap of crap", China's largest "traitor", not only their own "treason", and he went to negotiate with Japan to sign the Treaty of Maguan when the son also took, let his son also participated in the signing of the Maguan Treaty, the result of the outbreak of "movement." But today, looking back at the history, looking back at the "Scarlet Twilight", Li Hongzhang is a great hero of the Chinese nation, we will again to understandThis conclusion. Therefore do not for 1:30 when there is no glory and meritorious to dispute. When we look at historical issues, especially those who do basic science, we should see more of your historical value and contribution to the future. Our company should tolerate the "crooked Melon split Date" of the strange thinking. Once said Crooked Melon split JuJube, they put "crack" written inferior "inferior", I said you made a mistake, the date is the most sweet, melon is crooked the sweetest, although they are not everyone optimistic, but we look at these people from a strategic perspective. Today we re-Wang Guowei, Li Hongzhang, in fact they are the history of the "crooked melon date." People engaged in basic research, sometimes do not need a quick buck, we never let you go than the number of these things, just want you to be able to do academic. But not good enough, because our values are not fully unified, unified values are through the number of generations of the running-in only possible. Now we are not sure, but we try to do it.