Absrtact: No matter how we look at it, it is hype, or two of Life-and-Death wars, and the online debate between the mobile-testing company and handset-maker is over. If you haven't followed up the debate completely, here's a summary of the double
No matter how we look at it, it is hype, or two of Life-and-Death wars, and the "online public debate" between the mobile-testing company and handset-maker has passed.
If you don't follow up on the whole debate, here's a summary of the two sides ' general points:
Luo thought that taking the world's highest-end components would set up a top-end cell phone, think that the hammer phone does exist a certain problem, but is nothing but acceptable error, to the king freely on the hand is deliberately magnified, even with unfair evaluation methods, resulting in the hammer phone scoring low.
And Wang freely think that all consumers will encounter problems are designed by the way, that their zealer the standard of mobile phone evaluation is absolutely objective and impartial, very scientific basic can not be modified, and hammer phone in the evaluation of the problem is zealer standard unacceptable.
Of course, on the premise of such a view, the two sides "debate" on the issues discussed before, for most of the people who have seen the live broadcast, this debate has not been a "debate".
One side is an old teacher with feelings and love for her own son, on the other side is a newborn calf eager to change industry standards by evaluating it. A demo whiteboard with the paper report style, and the other prepared the field test equipment but did not get the scene test; a piece of the "biological son" of the various parts know, The other is just looking at the surface and dismantling the visible part; a talk about sensibility, a talk about rationality. Such a controversy in any case is not a win-win, the final outcome also confirmed this point: a play on the control of the full pace of the old man to end the confrontation, the king freely because of being caught can not use the rational retort of the dead point helpless leave.
Both sides acknowledged that the handsets produced by the international first-line manufacturers of Apple and Samsung have been carefully tuned. The old man explained that the hammer because the supplier's problem is not perfect, the hammer has some problems other similar mobile phones have; Wang freely think whether it is the supplier's reasons, and similar to other models of the problem is a problem. The old Luo defy request freely take out the specific parts and components of the competitor supply information, the King freely take not come out without language coagulation pharynx.
Onlookers were mixed in the controversy. The old Luo takes the sentiment as the foundation, takes out some colleague contrast data, corrected the Wang freely to the cell phone appraisal unfair, also many times in each other's statement interrupts each other. The banter King freely cannot take out the detailed information of the colleague, will the king freely to the handset "unfair" the evaluation and some fictitious libel to compare, and the irony that it has received the investment of many vendors and had to be in the standard to protect these manufacturers.
For many years as a teacher's work experience, lo inductive questioning, the analogy of the concept of substitution, and irony is the embodiment of eloquence, to take out the skills to deal with the less eloquent king is clearly more than sufficient, so a play on the control of the rhythm, and the other side firmly locked in their prepared debate process.
and Wang freely to zealer rational standards as the basis, holding the so-called industry standards and professionalism, questioned the old phone is not the so-called perfect Craftsman spirit manufacturing. With some rational analysis of evidence to question the concept of a perceptual, such a process of argumentation is a problem, and Wang freely but very confident that their rational logic and standard-setting is no problem. Wang freely because of eloquence and analysis of the speed of the problem, not from the beginning to grasp the rhythm, but not timely found in the transfer of the topic, old Luo led by the nose.
However, for the authorities, both sides are aware of their strengths, but they have misjudged each other's strength.
Lao Luo as a feeling of mobile phone manufacturers, to their own son must be very familiar with, in the old Luo can come up with so much to communicate with the supplier of the mail and interpretation can be seen, from the beginning of the complete control of the "biological son" body every part of the ins and outs, for the hammer all the problems of mobile phone source He knows better than anyone. Wang freely is a high end of the mobile phone evaluation of people, the comparison of the same type of mobile phone is also very sure, otherwise there is no way to establish the so-called Zealer 2.0 standard, but he is not clear, the parts supplier of the manufacturer's specific custom parameters, more unclear the software factory set deviation.
Old Lois for Wang freely took the peer mobile phone manufacturer's investment, will be able to understand the mobile phone parts of the entire supply chain, and to know the peer to the supply of parts of the detailed contract, which is obviously overrated Wang freely. And the king freely think that old Luo is to reason than to the problem raised in the video, his own as a benchmark can not understand the whole supply chain situation and specific custom contract, want to from the evaluation of the mobile phone manufacturing industry ambitions too big, not self-knowledge underestimated the old.
To be blunt, hammers and zealer are not products of the same time. Mobile phone manufacturers of course to their own products better understanding, the supplier is more clear, but it will not be able to get other similar contracts of the specific content, so it is impossible to completely replicate peer products, especially small manufacturers of Apple Samsung such giants. And the evaluation can only be tested by taking the prototype the content of the test can only be based on its final performance, even if the demolition machine can only understand the parts suppliers, and different models of internal design differences, it is impossible to fully understand a change (design, customization, drive and even software) can cause changes.
The two-dimensional authorities are aware of their own direction and the scope of their capabilities, the only thing to say is: "Lao Luo behaved very impolite, and Wang freely overestimated himself." The bystanders want to know the truth, I am afraid that all mobile phone parts suppliers to provide all the manufacturers of the custom contract, think of it is a delusion, go back.