Search engine for original processing details and the proportion of the algorithm in the experiment

Intermediary transaction SEO diagnosis Taobao guest Cloud host technology Hall

White hat seo, nothing more than a long-term observation, the experiment, practice method of the process, and no unfathomable theory. This article is about the different search engines for original content processing details and the proportion of the algorithm in the small experiment. It gives you an idea of how to watch search engines and how to experiment with websites.

When it comes to original content, the importance of site optimization is needless to say, in any article about SEO will be mentioned, and will emphasize the importance of original content for website optimization. But few articles describe in detail the different attitudes of different search engines to original content. According to my observation, in fact, different search engines for original content processing details are completely different, in its algorithm accounted for the proportion of the difference. Let's do a little experiment like this now.

Subjects: baidu/soso/360 so/google/sogou/youdao/bing

Experimental material: Original article "Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage on the site"

Experimental Preparation:

First step March 23 upload original article, starting in the new network company blog

Address: http://www.0769xp.com/blog/post/150.html title: Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage outside the chain on the site

The second step March 28 in A5 Webmaster Network

Address: http://www.admin5.com/article/20130328/494811.shtml title: Beware of the negative impact of the outside chain on the website

The third step is collected or reproduced by many websites, roughly divided into three kinds of types:

A Regular reprint, retain the original address. B without the integrity of reproduced, did not retain the original address. C no good reprint, change the mess.

In order to observe more content, I was in the A5 webmaster network, deliberately modified the title, the content is exactly the same.

Official experiment:

In order to ensure that different search engines can have enough time to index content, so we set the observation in half a month. Open the major search engines, directly search the original content title.

Baidu (baidu.com) Observation:

First search in the original title "Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage outside the chain on the site"

First place: Collect the website, belong to B without the integrity reprint, did not retain the original address. In fact, piracy infringement of the website.

Second: A5 webmaster network, this is my initiative to engage in the site.

Third: A5 Webmaster forum posts, users used to brush the forum points.

Second search cast title "Beware of the negative impact of the outside chain on the site"

First: A5 webmaster network, this is my initiative to engage in the site.

Second: A5 Webmaster forum posts, users used to brush the forum points.

Third place: Reprint the website, belongs to A regular reprint, retains the original address.

Search for different titles have no original initial URLs indexed.

Baidu Conclusion: Original content for Baidu, not according to the starting time to judge, but by the weight of the site. Popular point, "What original not original, who face big is the" extremely disrespect content copyright may be Baidu's attitude to original content. This is a very big blow to the small web site that is doing the original content honestly, is not your thing to decide by yourself. Here can not just criticize the voice of Baidu, the value of the affirmative is Baidu's ability to analyze the content is very strong, I deliberately modified the title of the article, the search results are different titles of the site intersection, prove that Baidu fully understand that the two search is the same content.

Search (soso.com) Observation:

First search in the original title "Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage outside the chain on the site"

First place: Initial original site, that is, the new network company blog address.

Second place: Reprint the website, belongs to A regular reprint, retains the original address.

Third place: The following are all the results of soy sauce.

Second search cast title "Beware of the negative impact of the outside chain on the site"

First: A5 webmaster network, this is my initiative to engage in the site.

Second: Baidu Encyclopedia, belong to B without the integrity of reproduced, did not retain the original address.

Third place: Reprint the website, belongs to A regular reprint, retains the original address.

Sixth place: Initial original website, that is, the new network company blog address.

Search for different titles have an original starting site is indexed.

Search the conclusion: relative to Baidu, search for the original content of the more clear-cut attitude, basically through the start time to judge the original article. But the ability to analyze content is much inferior to Baidu. This is why there are so much difference between the two search results.

360 Search (so.com) Observations:

First search in the original title "Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage outside the chain on the site"

First place: Collect the website, belong to B without the integrity reprint, did not retain the original address. In fact, piracy infringement of the website. (Same as Baidu)

Second place: First original web site, that is, the new network company blog address.

Third place: Reprint the website, belongs to A regular reprint, retains the original address. (Same as Baidu)

Second search cast title "Beware of the negative impact of the outside chain on the site"

First: A5 webmaster network, this is my initiative to engage in the site. (Same as Baidu)

Second place: Reprint the website, belongs to A regular reprint, retains the original address.

Third: A5 Webmaster forum posts, users used to brush the forum points. (Same as Baidu)

Search the original title of the original site is indexed.

360 Search Conclusion: Do not want to comment too much, only to say, the imitators want to go beyond any heavy and far.

Google search (google.com.hk) Observation:

First search in the original title "Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage outside the chain on the site"

First place: Initial original site, that is, the new network company blog address.

Second: acquisition site, belong to C no good reprint, change the mess.

Third: A5 webmaster network, list URL, not to engage in Web site.

Second search cast title "Beware of the negative impact of the outside chain on the site"

First place: Initial original site, that is, the new network company blog address.

Second place: initial original website, new network company blog List page.

Third place: Collect the website, belong to C not good reprint, change of mess. (same as second name for first search results)

Google concluded: I am not a penny, but I have to heartily praise from the United States, the world's first search engine on the original content of the attitude and content analysis of the ability, perhaps this is the domestic search brand and the international search brand is the real gap between. Want to do the world's brand search engine, learn to point it. Just want to be king in the circle can float. Here is a small detail, for Google, the weight of the list page is really very high oh.

Sogou Search (sogou.com) Observation:

First search in the original title "Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage outside the chain on the site"

First place: Initial original site, that is, the new network company blog address.

Second place: Reprint the website, belongs to A regular reprint, retains the original address.

Third: Collection site, belong to B without the integrity of reproduced, did not retain the original address.

Second search cast title "Beware of the negative impact of the outside chain on the site"

First: A5 webmaster network, this is my initiative to engage in the site.

Second: acquisition site, belong to B without the integrity of reproduced, did not retain the original address.

Third: Collection site, belong to B without the integrity of reproduced, did not retain the original address.

Sogou Conclusion: The search engine, to treat the original to maintain respect for the content of the analysis ability is also weak, two times the search results are relatively large.

Youdao Search (youdao.com) Observation:

First search in the original title "Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage outside the chain on the site"

First place: soy sauce Drifting past

Second place: the soy sauce floats over

Third place: Third place? No third place.

Second search cast title "Beware of the negative impact of the outside chain on the site"

First place: Reprint the website, belongs to A regular reprint, retains the original address.

Second place: A5 webmaster NET, List page

Third place: soy sauce drifting

Youdao conclusion: As long as the next time do not say you are to do search engine is good, we can understand.

Bing Search (bing.com) Observation:

First search in the original title "Beware of the negative impact of malicious garbage outside the chain on the site"

First place: initial original website, that is, the new Network Company blog List page, not article address.

Second Name: Regular reprint list page, not article address.

Third place: No integrity reprint list page, not article address

Second search cast title "Beware of the negative impact of the outside chain on the site"

First: A5 webmaster network, this is my initiative to engage in the site.

Second place: No integrity reprint list page, not article address

Third place: Initial original website, that is, the new Network Company blog List page, not article address.

Bing conclusion: OK, next time you find the content of the list page, you will use it.

The above is an observation of the details of seven search engines dealing with original content. Respect for original or not, just different search engine algorithm difference, and no right and wrong points. The above personal conclusions if the obvious likes and dislikes, is purely personal temperament, does not intend to interfere with your observation. The above experiment material is few, the cycle is short, unavoidably appear biased, please everybody reader understanding. Through this experiment, probably also understand the new network site Why in Google, search and so on above performance is very good (interested friends can observe) because of respect for the original search engine, it is inevitable in its site ranking algorithm accounted for a heavier proportion. If all search engines start not to respect original content, all believe "whose face is big even who's," then who adds fresh blood to the Internet?

Original from the New Network company blog: http://www.0769xp.com/blog/post/152.html Reprint please keep the address.