SEO experiments prove that search engine words can not fully believe

We often trust the people inside the search engine, but it turns out that their words are not fully believed.

I do not imply that the search engine's intention to deceive us, but the search engine system is too big and complex, no one can master all. This is not, a few days ago held the PubCon conference someone asked Http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/10961.html ">matt Cutts, if a page has multiple links to another page, So nofollow one of them, does that mean that the others are nofollow? Matt Cutts replied that he was not very clear about it and had to go back and ask.

Even if you have a clear answer, you can't trust it all. At last month's SMX conference, a senior Yahoo executive said Yahoo had completely ignored keywords tag a few months ago. Google has never used keywords tags, and Baidu and Bing seem to have completely ignored keywords tags, so yahoo is the only search engine in the rankings to consider keywords tags. Yahoo's official stance is no longer considered at all.

But what about the truth? I deliberately did a SEO experiment, one months ago began to do.

I am in the new virtual host Home keywords tag added to this section-"Wood therapy kicking melon sdfghj." Then observe the word (as if it's a word, or don't know how to say it) in the search engine rankings. The word before I add in the home page, in Baidu, Google,yahoo have no results.

20th See the result is that Baidu is still no results, indicating that Baidu completely ignore keywords tag.

Google has two results:

This is the other domain name information query site to the home page information, including keywords tag content, listed in the page. There is no result of further use of the word "wood therapy kicking melon sdfghj site:chinamyhosting.com":

It also shows that Google completely ignores keyword tags.

Search the Yahoo, the result is different:

Obviously, Yahoo not only records keywords tags, but also for rankings.

Yahoo later explained that the weight of the keywords label is the lowest, and anywhere else on the page, the keyword appears stronger than the keywords label. The words in the keywords tag work only if no other page contains the keywords.

Fortunately I also did another test, in the keywords label also added "yellow flying fish to make heaven" such a sentence. This word when I add in three search engines have matching pages appear, of course, the number is very small. Now in Baidu and Google search "yellow flying Fish in heaven", I can not find the home page, in line with expectations.

It's different in Yahoo:

Only the keywords label appears in the second page of keywords, more than some of the visible text contains keywords page.

So, Yahoo not only consider keywords tag, the weight is not as they say is the lowest lowest kind.

Conclusion One, blindly listen to the words of Yahoo insiders, or blindly believe their feelings and assert that keywords tag is completely useless, is, er, blind. Other search engines say the same thing on other occasions.

Conclusion Two, sometimes what you see on someone's website, the real reason for that is not necessarily what you think it is. If a person who has a chance to see my website Keywords label has two inexplicable words, I do not say, how many people know why? There may be people who can't think about it, and they can come up with a set of reasons for justifying it.

Finally, the screenshot commemorates the keywords label.

Author: Zac@seo Every day
Original load: New foreign server