SEO static really still useful?

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

General SEO view that the static page is conducive to SEO, so that a lot of SEO refactoring Site page, have to make their own site to create pseudo static URL, to increase their SEO effect. But SEO has been developed for several years, the previous static can indeed take a great effect, but now still useful?

The first dynamic site experience is better than static because information is updated quickly. and search engine Most attention is the search user's experience.

The second search engine update frequency is low, ASP page Baidu Spider visit frequency is much higher than HTML.

The third SEO is to improve their site in the search engine rankings, I am afraid that every SEO is recognized the fact, but now look does not have much advantage.

Finally, with the development of search engine technology, especially the Google for dynamic Code index is very skilled, the technology level has completely reached the ability to index HTML, there is no difference.

The fifth HMTL page has decreased over time.

The sixth HTML page can not increase the number of included, but the sand monk SEO when doing the station found that ASP site more than HTML included.

Seventh, please do not underestimate the strength of the search engine, the development of the search engine has not exceeded the "?" The barrier of this symbol? Still think static is easier to crawl?

HTML is what we normally call static Web sites, generally speaking, static web sites are almost not updated, especially the news system CMS, the resulting page is really rarely modified; dynamic pages often have many real-time needs, indeed in practical applications, are used in the content of the high frequency of the site.