Several neglected SEO problems

A few days ago a friend called Friagan to me to write an email, asked a few he thought is the internet has never been mentioned SEO problems. More questions, the need for a short text to answer clearly, so with the consent of Friagan, write a post public answer, may also help others.

Question one: Can the article first read to the search engine, and then to the reader to see?

You mentioned that the search engine to judge the original based on a lot, can be time, authority, PR value. According to this theory, within a few hours of your original release, I have sent your articles to my website, at least 40% are mistaken for an original opportunity, if I have a more authoritative site than you, my chances are greater.

Is there a way to prevent this loss? For example, you can leave your article before the search engine to go over the public.

The method is that when you create a page, do not publish the URL of this page, but through my first question in the method, do a few only search engine can see the link, link to this page, three months later to open the URL of the page, at this time even if the page was copied, search engines can make judgments. Of course, also not necessarily through my first question in the way to do the link, you can do in some old page links, the old page generally no one to see, everyone likes to see the latest release of the news. However, this raises my third question, please see my third question.

Answer: Of course, if you can do it first to the search engine to see, and ordinary users can not see, do increase the chance of being judged as original. The problem is, as long as the search engine can see, is included, there must be users can see, although it may be a few days later. Many of the AdSense copied content, but also from the search engine and then copied.

Another more common way to copy articles is to subscribe to the RSS feed, and as soon as new content is available, the copycat will see it. I am afraid it is difficult to do such a CMS system, the new content released, only on the old page link, but not into the RSS seed, which has lost the meaning of RSS. Unless you specialize in such a CMS system.

In addition, the time is only to judge the original factor, the domain name Trust degree is also very important. A few days ago I was in the grassroots interview, search results can see this phenomenon.

Question two: Does the link look like plain text, is it a hidden link?

Almost all SEO staff have a large number of links on the blog, give a link is likely because the article does relate to the link to the content, or perhaps SEO experts deliberately arranged a keyword but pretend to be natural to give this link, anyway, This behavior appears to be understandable in the blog of an SEO person.

But if I'm doing an ordinary website, in order to optimize a keyword, also in an article through a keyword to give some links to my home page, may be a puzzle to the reader, because the reader see blue underlined text always want to click, when he clicked, found to return to my home page, This is probably quite annoying to the reader, so, I think, can be a link to a keyword, but in the CSS style is defined as a black font, no underline, with no link around the text, which has 3 purposes:

Purpose 1 is-search engines will see my links, but reading will not be disturbed

Purpose 2 is-if someone copies my article, it will incidentally copy my link, if he is careless enough, he doesn't know that he has copied my link.

Purpose 3 is-(mentioned in my second question)

Do you think that this kind of behavior is considered to be cheating, because he lets the search engine see what the reader cannot see, although the reader is not completely invisible, he sees at least the keyword, but does not see the link.