Shanghai-Nanjing High-speed rail is meant to save time and low fares

The fastest train on the Shanghai-Nanjing line takes 1 hours and 57 minutes, the slowest high-speed train needs 1 hours 58 minutes, Gao Tieyi and so on 233 yuan, the bullet train first-class ticket 112 yuan, for the passenger less Ministry of Railways keeper to increase direct Gao Tiewen/Our correspondent Li Ying yesterday media reports, since July 11, the railway department announced,　　It only runs for a week. Shanghai-Nanjing Intercity high-speed railway implementation of the new train map, Shanghai to Nanking will be an additional 13 to direct train, and restore 11 days (including the day) ticket pre-sale period. Prior to the adjustment, the railway department has suspended the sale of July 11 and after the Shanghai-Nanjing high-speed rail tickets. At that time, the Shanghai Railway Bureau said the indefinite suspension of ticket sales was an "optimization" service. But in fact, some media reported that the adjustment appeared to be due to the number of passengers.　　There have been complaints that Shanghai-Nanjing high-speed rail fares are too high and the traffic time saved is negligible. Time does not reduce the price of the Shanghai-Nanjing high-speed railway July 1 to open the line, to Nanjing, the fastest 73 minutes.　　But Shanghai-Nanjing between a stop to a direct high-speed train only 2 pairs, most of the high-speed train stops along the way more, compared to the old EMU, speed advantage is not obvious, but the price is much more expensive. Reporter learned that, in the D-word has not been artificially large replacement, Shanghai-Nanjing line of the fastest train D3009 only 1 hours and 57 minutes. The slowest class of the G-word head of Shanghai-Nanjing high-speed railway takes 1 hours and 58 minutes. The current G-word-long range of 1 hours and 40 minutes, D-Head large to 2 hours and 20 minutes, on average, g-word head than D-head only faster than 40 minutes. G Word first first-class block 233 yuan, second-class block 146 yuan.　　D Word first first-class block 112 yuan, second-class block 93 yuan.　　Simple calculation, Shanghai-Nanjing Gao Tieyi and other fares than the original EMU up to 108%, second-class fares 146 yuan, higher than the EMU second-class fares about 57%.　　Ticket high attendance low at the end of June, between Beijing and Shanghai 1461/1462 Times, "Green car" officially withdrew from the stage of history. It is history to spend only 88 yuan from Beijing to Shanghai. 1461/1462 Times has been the cheapest train in the Beijing-Shanghai, and the only one that has been saved. Before the upgrade, the train fares for 88 yuan, upgraded to air-conditioned car 1461 times after the fare is 158 yuan, or nearly 50%.　　Since July 1, the national Railway has implemented a new railway operation map, at the same time, according to the Ministry of Railways "green car" to replace the air conditioning body deployment, Beijing, Shanghai, into the ear three to use the green car to open the line of passenger trains all replaced as air-conditioned cars.　　Today's high-speed rail has undoubtedly become a symbol of China's railway construction miracle, but there is controversy behind the high-speed rail.　　According to media reports, high-speed rail ticket sales are not optimistic, the most "hot" G7001 every day only sold more than 100 tickets, attendance less than 10%. High pricing is probably one of the main reasons why attendance is low. Netizen "King Demeanor 10" dispatch analysis, Shanghai to Nanjing the same distance, before the need to spend 2 hours 20 minutes, 0.309 yuan per kilometer fare, the fare for 0.664 yuan per minute, and the opening of high-speed rail, time reduced by 17.86%, butBoth prices rose by 20.16% and 56.99% respectively.　　Because of the short distance, the speed of more than 300 kilometers of high-speed rail can not be played to the extreme-only two of the longest not more than 12 km to reach 350 km/h, the time spent on the people is not significantly reduced, which in part also reduces the attraction of high-speed rail. "King Style 10" also calculate a sum of people travel counting, think "if a person between Shanghai and Nanjing, to a week for example, the cost to increase more than one times."　　If according to different ways of travel, sit K, T-head of the car from Nanjing to Shanghai spent 47 yuan, the time is also long, between 3 hours to 6 hours; If you take a high-speed bus, it takes 3 hours and the fare is only 70 yuan. User experience "by high-speed rail" Netizen "SZMYQ" also posted their own personal experience: "I sat in the evening of July 4 G7189 from Suzhou to Shanghai for the first time to feel the high-speed rail, the same harmonious train, no change in the car, service unchanged, speed did not change significantly, the only obvious change is the fare. The second-class seat is 41 yuan from 26 yuan, and a 31-dollar reference is 65 yuan. That's it. "And the Netizen" guohuili1981 "then directly will own first experience summary for the high-speed rail many" counts ": first, not comfortable, accelerated deceleration when there is tinnitus; second, not convenient, docked in Shanghai suburbs, less public transport, less rental; three, not time-saving, than the original EMU save only 10% time; four, not cheap,　　More than 60% of the ticket price, five, not civilians, half of the seats are first-class; Ministry of Railways to respond to netizens "Shen Bin Telegraph pole Son" also wrote the first small poem "Early Hair Baidicheng-Shanghai-Nanjing high-speed rail": Toward the Huangpu Rainbow Edge, thousands of miles Jiangning day also.　　The two sides stop all the way, easy to spend 600 yuan.　　The railway department all of a sudden an additional 13 to the direct train, is the previous direct train number of 6 times times, not to say that the direct response to public opinion. The railway department has also responded to the highly controversial "fare". July 1, the Railway Ministry spokesman Wang on the Shanghai-Nanjing high-speed rail G5000 the first bus to Nanking, said the Railways Department is widely heard. "It now seems that there is more than one voice for fare, which is too high or moderate, because each passenger has a different affordability." It is premature to conclude that high-speed rail fares are subject to market testing. ”