Sichuan Golden Dome finally difficult to bear the weight of the lawsuit tomorrow will become "St Jinding"

-This reporter Rosan today's suspension will be eventful Sichuan Golden Summit pushed to the peak, because of the quagmire of debt disputes, the company encountered St.　　Sichuan Jinding Bulletin said that because the basic bank accounts were frozen, the main assets were seized, frozen, the company will be implemented since June 30, 2009 Other special treatment, the company's securities referred to as "St Jinding."　　"ST" hat suddenly flew to Sichuan Golden Dome at the same time, there is a bad news followed by the Huarong Financial Leasing Co., Ltd. application, the company in ICBC Emeishan branch of the 32.55 million Yuan bank deposit was frozen by the court, but has not received court summons and litigation-related instruments.　　June 10, Hangzhou West L. District People's Court in accordance with the relevant civil decisions, frozen Sichuan cement wholly-owned subsidiary Renshou County People's Special Cement Co., Ltd. (People's cement), Sichuan jinding Bank deposit RMB 32.55 million yuan or seizure (seizure) of the corresponding value of the property.　　Perhaps, Sichuan jinding holding shareholder Warren Group Limited and Chairman Chen Jianrong a series of capital operation is the source of the above debt dispute. Careful investors are not hard to find, the Sichuan Golden Dome lawsuit is already a commonplace, the current receipt of the reply to a total of 31 cases involved.　　In this many tangled lawsuits, the collection of debt collectors have banks, suppliers, private lending and government departments, the amount of up to 620 million yuan, close to the company nearly 680 million yuan net assets.　　In the above 620 million yuan of the claimed amount, at least 127 million yuan of foreign guarantee is not through the listed company Sichuan jinding decision-making process.　　This wave then a wave of debt disputes and property freeze, Sichuan jinding is another has been the big shareholder hollowed out "star power", and Chen Jianrong is a "Zhou Yiming"?　　According to the announcement, Sichuan Jinding and Warren Group chairman Chen Jianrong by Sichuan Province Leshan Public Security Bureau investigation, and Warren Group Co., Ltd. is also suspected of breach of the listed company interests case.　　So, investors may suddenly, the big shareholder Warren Group and Chen Jianrong and other related aspects of the listed companies encroached on assets, emptied the listed companies?　　It can be found that the Sichuan Golden Dome in the process of providing collateral with Chen Jianrong and so on, become innocent victims.　　For example, because of private lending disputes, Zhejiang Dadi paper by the creditor She Shengming a paper to court, and "guarantor" Chen Jianrong, Sichuan jinding also be "implicated". Interestingly, Sichuan golden Dome of this security status is Chen Jianrong and other relevant people "arrangements."　　It is reported that Chen Jianrong and other suspected to forge the Sichuan jinding part of the director of the signing and forgery of the company's board resolution, Sichuan Jinding has been submitted to the public security organs for investigation, to ascertain the truth of the guarantee.　　And in the private loan with Zhang Shugen, Sichuan Golden Summit was also rinse a, innocent involved in the "Joint and several liability" trap. However, Chengmenthe, implicating. Sichuan Golden Summit of the main property will be the court and home debt collection of creditors freeze control, the follow-up of its operations, personnel stability is not optimistic. With St hat after the "St Jinding" toIt is difficult to maintain normal production and operation.　　And the two-tier market share price and a large number of small and medium-sized shareholders can withstand the large shareholder brought this series of lawsuits? One will work millions bone withered, obviously large shareholder Warren Group and Chen Jianrong, and other illegal violations of the Sichuan Golden Summit of the interests of many small and medium-sized shareholders, heavy shareholders should be to whom to collect debt?