Snapshot update time is not an inevitable factor in ranking good

Abstract: I do not know should not come to talk about this topic, I put forward such a point of view, the author suddenly had a kind of and thousands of webmaster in the opposite sense, indeed a bit of a nervous, but I think since I found this point, whether it is right or wrong,

I don't know if I should talk about this, I put forward such a point of view, the author suddenly had a kind of and thousands of webmaster in the opposite sense, indeed a bit of a nervous, but I think since I found this point, whether it is right or wrong, I would like to have someone to communicate with me, As I always say: no argument, no resonance.

In the years of optimization work, our webmaster subconscious as if already reached a consensus, that is the snapshot of the update. If the snapshot update is yesterday, I guess the webmaster are very happy, and others do friendship links when also with this as a pingzhang. The reason is because if your snapshot 3 days did not let the search engine update, then your site is not down right is low weight, presumably also will not have any good rankings. But the reason why I put forward this argument is because I found that some of the site snapshots is obviously delayed for a long time, but the ranking is still high, so I began to doubt whether the snapshot of the update time is ranked excellent inevitable factor! Or is it just a superficial phenomenon?

Since we can't solve the problem head-on, we will analyze the reason from the negative point of view, first of all, we first list the first snapshot of the stagnation or back to the causes of several reasons:

1. The website made a little gesture

If this is the case, the search engine response is quite intense, the site to make a revision of the basic instability can be good optimization, search engines will let your site appear back to the phenomenon.

2. The sudden and abrupt decrease of the outer chain

Whether you increase the chain or refuse to come and outside the chain, the chain of sudden surges and sudden reduction will cause snapshots of stagnation. Because the search engine is likely to think you are using other tools to carry out the chain of software, the quality of these outside the chain can be imagined, now Baidu has launched a Baidu rejection of the chain of tools, if not correct use, will also cause this problem.

3. Resisting must be in first.

I think the word "resisting" is very apt to describe the content of the website. Want to get better rankings and flow first to control the content of your site. If a site has long been trusted by search engines, content has a bit of collection or low quality, should not have much impact. But if you collect and publish a low quality article for a long time, the search engine will be unbearable! How to grasp this level, depends on the webmaster are willing to do their own work.

4. Stable and continuous updates

This is a cliché, keep a stable update frequency and time is a good choice to keep the snapshot, if a site is not updated for a long time, the site has no vitality, search engine and how will favor with you?

The above 4 points, is the author summed up for the analysis of the stagnation of Baidu snapshots, we use analysis to demonstrate that: snapshot time or the weight of the rankings has nothing to do

For example, we will search the word of Beijing website construction, look at the snapshot under this keyword

From the position of the callout in the figure, we can see that this snapshot has been January 2013, it is 4 months ago, but the entry snapshot is the 5th (excluding promotion), does this indicate some problems?

I was asked if you could make a point with this snapshot. Yes, so I am also very disturbed, then we will analyze the following, what kind of snapshots to determine the weight and rank it!

1. Home snapshot stagnation, not included in the page, generally this situation appears for a week, your site has been able to definitely be down the right, and the punishment is greater.

2.site not in the first. We have encountered this situation, there are three possible: A: Baidu take back the snapshot to observe, the follow-up may be released. B: The right to fall. C: Site internal weight disorder.

3.domain not in the first. I can not guarantee that domain is not the first site are down right, but the right to be down the site domain is not the first.

Through the above three points, but think, we need what kind of snapshots of the site, smart Webmaster also see out.

The reason why I want to risk this argument is because sometimes we focus too much on the problem of snapshots, and often ignore the other important SEO work, whether it is out of the chain or exchange links, our focus on the core work and results should not only be sterilized one of the indicators, this is through my own discovery of the goods a little experience. I do not dare to hope that the webmaster recognition, sometimes may just hope that they can understand more.