Social is human nature.

Abstract: In fact, write this article, completely did not want to go to in-depth study of such a big topic of social networking, from the Friday night with an investment circle friend of the simple dialogue, feel also a bit of meaning, share the right when to communicate with you. Didn't think of a good mark

In fact, write this article, completely did not want to go to in-depth study of such a big topic of social networking, from the Friday night with an investment circle friend of the simple dialogue, feel also a bit of meaning, share the right when to communicate with you. Did not think of a good title, just use this bar (the following investors referred to as "vote", I use "John" abbreviation).

A: I think you've written a few articles about secrets recently.

John: I think it's worth studying, it's probably the next direction, but we're actually doing some exploring, and it's probably interesting to see how people like this product work at all levels.

Vote: Which class do you think the MO is suitable for?

John: I personally think that the stranger to the social development of acquaintances, complete strangers socializing I think is a pseudo proposition, can not long-term precipitation. The secret seems a bit between strangers and acquaintances, and although it's not social at the moment, there may be something similar coming out of the future.

Cast: The product does not have much communication, but this model is inherently difficult to communicate with it, but it will be more fun to use two days.

John: Not necessarily, the future is not impossible. But there is also a problem, if the resulting content is not sustainable to stimulate people's fun mentality, and can not provide some other valuable things, it may be only a while, so I would rather know what they intend to do next.

Cast: This is a very interesting proposition, I think this kind of social: it is a very adverse thing for an acquaintance to make a deviation from an acquaintance.

John: Yes, that's an interesting statement.

Cast: So I think this is to reduce the cost of communication between people, I am embarrassed to say, or can not directly say, reduce the barriers to communication.

John: Yes, but what's different with complete strangers is that the things that are said may be related to you.

Cast: Yes, so this is a tool to reduce the barriers of communication between acquaintances, which is valuable.

John: So I think it's kind of like misty poetry, there's something in the middle, but you can feel the value of it.

Cast: This is human nature, but now the secret is too negative energy, only exposed the dark side of human nature, not exposing the sadness of human nature and other aspects.

John: Well, that might have been a surprise at first.

Cast: So I think the secret is not between acquaintances and strangers, the initial rules of the community determine the development behind.

John: It also shows that the facets of human nature are often just not shown, which may also be relevant to everyone's circle.

Cast: The class theory that you have just mentioned, do not know whether the class is really divided.

John: I'm not sure, maybe the human nature is not divided, just to see when the eruption.

Cast: Do you prefer a whisper or something like that?

John: I might look a little more like a secret.

Cast: Why do you prefer a secret like this rather than a whisper?

John: I think whisper less obscure things in it, it is difficult to provoke more human things, because the content may be interesting, but not too much relationship with themselves. It means that what you see on the whisper may be something you feel, and it's valuable, but what you see in secret may be related to you.

Cast: But now secretly more and more with me, is the more friends, the more I have no relationship, this is a big contradiction.

John: So it depends on how to control this delicate relationship.

Cast: But this seems to have always been this contradiction, the more friends more than I have no relationship, we are more afraid to say.

John: Yes, micro-mail is the same, although acquaintances socialize, but now many people do not have much relationship with me, many people do not know.

Cast: Yes, this is the most disgusting place in the social network, in fact, many people in your address book and you do not have too much relationship, there is no good screening process, but it seems impossible to have this screening, otherwise we all know.

John: Yes, a lot of contradictory things, but it's interesting, so it depends on the value of a limited circle.

Cast: However, there is a phenomenon, the address book is now used more and less, but similar to the secret products have inspired everyone to use the Address Book.

John: Yes, the social thing is human nature, so all kinds of novelty phenomena are normal, just to see if it can be stimulated.

Vote: Do you have any social product experts? Talk a lot.

John: We don't know much about wood.

Cast: You know that, and you're looking at these new trends very quickly.

John: I don't know, these ideas are what I think when I talk to you. We are focused on some of the latest patterns and trends and hope to see the future here.

The conversation is basically over here, though it's a bit of a piecemeal conversation, but through this exchange I find that when a new product inspires something of humanity, whether it inspires evil or good, it may be the beginning we did not anticipate, but it is also worth some exploration, debate, affirmation, or even the final negation.

The question of whether strangers or anonymous socializing in the conversation really reduces the barriers to communication I still doubt that, if from the perspective of communication efficiency, direct communication efficiency should be the highest, but for some of the words do not facilitate direct communication, what is the most effective way, Does the current social product do this?

PS: If you have a different idea for this piece, you are welcome to post your comments below.