Some questions about "teachers in yy monthly income 900,000"

Today, I saw Lee Colling on the internet that there are traditional institutions of the teacher in YY to achieve a monthly income of 900,000, than four months ago, 200,000 yuan growth several times. How much guidance does this 900,000 have for teachers and institutions? Please yy to answer these questions first. One, 900,000 are all online course fees? Know that it's hard to pay online, especially in large amounts. Can be online on a single platform for a monthly income of hundreds of thousands of yuan teachers, line off the charge will be more. As far as I know, there are not a few teachers only put on the line, are online at the same time, there will be some mixed shifts, such as a few face-to-face classes + several network classes unified fees (may go online payment channels). The first question is whether the 900,000 dollars are all tuition fees paid for online courses? is part of the tuition fee included on the offline shift? Two: 900,000 yuan, the long-term curriculum of the proportion of prepaid? Education and training is a very good cash flow industry, because it is prepaid, line work six months or even a year of tuition fees almost become a practice, this online education can not be exception. If the teacher "happens" to have a few months of online classes, this month is the payment period, the concentration of 900,000, that figure does not explain what, because next month may not harvest. Three: How many students can teachers get from yy? The main requirement of the teacher on the online platform is to recruit students, solve the enrollment problem, technology and product experience not too bad on the OK. The latter I believe YY did many years of instant communication technology skills, the question is that enrollment? YY the whole idea is to do commercial real estate, that is, Ma said Wanda Mode, sell "land" and flow, attract merchants settled in. The settled merchant, has the game Guild, has the entertainment host, certainly also will have the teacher and the training organization. At present, the flow of YY education is not small, but the overall quality of users is not high, not the institutions and teachers are available to recruit high-quality traffic. Current flow value is not high, new traffic is limited (at the beginning of Lee Colling has disclosed YY education month active users 3 million, but after no mention of relevant data). Can not effectively solve the problem of enrollment, pure as a tool exists, YY's appeal is not big enough. What's the point of throwing that number? The meaning of the teacher is needless to say, income is "seduce" them out of the organization, the most direct bargaining chip. For institutions, there are subtle implications. Many organizations have recognized the next few years will occur in two major trends: one is the rise of online education, the second is the use of network platform teachers to complete the enrollment of teaching, to the institutional (in the field of study and other fields already have signs). So when yy out of the olive branch, most institutions are wavering-put a good course on the line, the impact line is bound to work, affect profits, not put, excellent teachers with the help of online platform to leave the organization, to bring good content, the organization is still very passive. But instead of pushing this trend, it's better to wait and see. YY hope to get the organization hands that batch of the best content, then will be from the teacher to the institutional work, let traditional organizations more urgent to recognize this trend, "900,000" also logically become yy hand good card. Author Introduction: BigKaishi a soldier, like gossip, obsessed with the net, love to ask questions.