Some things about the user experience quantification

From the end of last year to the beginning of this year, I divided three times I read the article "User Experience quantization method research" through the UED blog for serialization. Enthusiastic netizens from all walks of life have commented on this article, there are objections, there are suggestions, there are many suggestions. Last week, when I shared this article with you through carbonated drinks, my colleagues also gave the most intense discussion. When I saw the comments of netizens on the UED blog, when I recalled the wonderful discussions in the process of sharing carbonated beverages, I first felt gratified;

One: Why do you feel gratified?

This article has been published for some time, but during this time, too few people have paid attention to this article. In the days when there is no affirmation, no negation, no doubt, no suggestion, the "User experience quantification method research" has been shelved. Through the ued blog, carbonated drinks, I saw a lot of people are looking at this topic, the comments may be more of a challenge to the study, but I'm still relieved that I've seen so many people looking at this topic, and when people see it, they think, have different suggestions, and have heated discussions ... This situation makes me feel valuable in doing this research. At the same time, when I saw the feedback from everyone, I felt the anticipation of the future development of this research, which gave me the motivation to carry on the research of the user experience quantification. And that's what I'm thankful for.

Two: what motivates?

The motivation can be summed up in two aspects, on the one hand, in terms of the study itself, found that there are many deficiencies in the study, need to be further improved; On the other hand, in terms of the significance of research, research and practical work are far apart, how to apply the content of the study in practice need

&http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/37954.html ">nbsp; The process of the study

The research process has exposed a lot of deficiencies, these deficiencies is the follow-up work to improve one of the content.

First, the theoretical foundation is weak and needs to be strengthened. The resources of the article are too little, which leads to some parts of the content not enough theoretical support, such as the user experience quantization hierarchy model proposed. Some people say this level "twist bar", some people say this level is not complete ... There are these problems, and the theoretical foundation is not only reflected in the experience of quantitative hierarchy model construction, in the paper there are many problems, we need to improve the point of these problems. It is gratifying that netizens not only point out the lack of theoretical knowledge, but also provide a lot of valuable reference materials, such as Popfan wrote in the message: "User experience can refer to some of the experimental psychology of the case and quantification methods." "Psyduck said:" Think the most important is to find the effectiveness of measurable variables, recommend a book "User Experience Measurement", which has more detailed methods and cases. Thanks to the enthusiastic netizens.

Second, the study of the control of the experiment need to be more stringent. During the sharing of carbonated beverages, we are very concerned about the control of the experiment in the study. In the research and in the actual work, it is very important for the screening of the users, the selection of the auxiliary products and the selection of the experiment site. This requires more attention in subsequent studies.

Third, the practical application of research methods need to be more perfect. In the sharing of carbonated beverages, the most heated discussion is how the method is applied to practice. Taking mobile phone as an example, this paper studies the behavior-centered quantization method, in which the whole task (which can be divided into 3 subtasks) is treated as a main body in the later data processing. Although in the experiment we try to control the errors caused by the conversion between different tasks, but the error can not be avoided, it is bound to have a certain impact on the later data. In the subsequent research, we will make a more reasonable and sufficient arrangement of resources, and will combine the task-centered quantization method to conduct a thorough analysis of the behavior-centered quantization method.

Significance of the study

Many people are questioning the significance of the study. Someone on the blog said: "There is time to pull a bunch of useless, but also hurriedly solve the problem of Taobao on the use of Firefox!" ' Bought baby ' history query is very bad! Yeeshao in the message, said sharply: "Unfortunately it seems more mature and complete part of the feeling of new bottled wine, and the new unresolved areas still point to the total no breakthrough." ”

Indeed, research in schools is time-consuming, compared with actual work, and results are often not widely used. But we believe that all innovation is done in the groping, and perhaps the next success is based on this attempt. In the follow-up study, I will seriously consider the suggestions we have given, closely combined with the current Internet industry, combined with practice to improve the user experience quantization method to obtain the general user experience quantification model for the ultimate goal.

Finally, thank all the enthusiastic people for their criticisms, questions and suggestions! At the same time, I hope more friends who are interested in this research, may wish to stick to it.

Third: PostScript

Please pay attention to us, we will "user experience quantification method research" persist in the end.

Source: http://ued.taobao.com/blog/2010/06/29/on/