Summer Grass Network issued a report to the gold Mantis apology reports unauthorized

"Summer Grass" apology out of context screenshot Tencent Financial News today, Shanghai Securities newspaper, securities times and other media published a "Summer Grass apology" report. The effect refers to the allegation that the gold mantis false evidence is insufficient, Charlot apologized to the company. But just this morning, China's Accounting Vision Forum appeared a signed "Summer Grass" article, the article said "These reports are not authorized by the author, and all the reports are suspected of being out of context, I deeply regret this." The paper again talks about the financial problems of the gold mantis. The article says, "the headline used in the three major securities newspapers would mislead investors into thinking that the gold Mantis has no financial problems, in fact, the company's IPO and listing since the revenue recognition is wrong, so under the accounting rules, the gold mantis need to repeat the IPO prospectus and all the earnings since the listing, which constitutes a major legal and accounting statements, General Enterprises if there is an important issue of accounting treatment, IPO probability is very small, in a sense, due to the gold Mantis income recognition of a major error, it can still be identified gold Mantis fake listing. "The article believes that," the gold Mantis has not disclosed the 2007 annual income Confirmation Method change influence number, the gold Mantis also refuses to disclose the influence number privately to the author, the author thought that the gold mantis needs to make the correct timely correction to this mistake. According to the private exchange, the gold Mantis revealed not to consider changes in income, Gold Mantis 2007 gross margin is 15%, can the company's 2006 gross profit margin is 18.17%, the gold Mantis can not be the 2007 in the same revenue recognition method under the same gross profit margin of more than 3 percentage points to make a reasonable explanation. "The author said," the author did not understand the main margin of the company was produced in the final accounts link, mistaken that the 800 million project is 0 Maori projects, it was mainly suspected that the company in advance to confirm the proceeds, after understanding the situation, but also suspected that the company delayed the confirmation of earnings, but the company's 2008 gross margin is also lower than the large before the IPO, About the gold Mantis listed before and after the volatile gross margin, the author has not been reasonably explained. ”