Taxi software increases due to resource mismatch

The intention of the fare increase is not for the driver to earn extra money, but for the driver to take the initiative to take the road to emergency, deployment of resources compensation. If the market can be fully competitive, people use their feet to vote, the final precipitate generated prices must be more reasonable than now, in line with the interests of both drivers and passengers greatest. Wen/Li Shuai because the taxi is difficult, so have a taxi software; The government intervened, consumers were not happy. But recently, taxi software so that drivers are running a tip of the consumer to go, do not add a 20 yuan is not rejoined, consumers began to call on the government to regulate. See this thing, I think of the first image, is this year during the Spring Festival, Foshan, the peasant workers to buy train tickets for the small couple detained. It seems that I have not seen anyone support the public security authorities in detaining the couple. Every train ticket for a young couple increases by 10 yuan. A long-distance train fare may be at 200-400 yuan, the handling fee ratio is about 5%. But a car, generally not thirty or forty yuan. If you want to add 20 yuan, the rate of processing is more than 50%. For purchasing fees, it seems that the government is higher than the people demand. 10 Yuan handling charges we feel quite reasonable, can be the railway department tolerance limit is 5 yuan (must do the qualification card what the first to talk about). If you take a taxi, you can increase the price by 5 yuan, 10 yuan if the emergency also make it, and the government department's hope is: not to add a penny. Taxi software is a business service, not a public service, a penny is not to call people starve to death? The problem, however, is that the authorities do not have a substitute for the same level of car-making system as the 12306 Web site. It can be seen that the administrative plan is difficult to replace the market regulation. How should the problem be solved? We need to first clarify the concept of fare increase. The intention of fare increase is not to make extra money for drivers, but to reduce the vacancy rate and mismatch in resources. As a kind of urban public transportation service, taxis are not allowed to hire at all places. If you encounter not to increase the teacher, this can be used to regulate the scope of regulation. So, like the Guangzhou that some unlucky taxi, waved not to hit the car, there is a master parked car waiting for their fare increase situation, is not normal. What do you mean resource mismatch? Or take the railway for example, a train ticket, only a little bit on the window to sell, a large part of the way through various means into the hands of cattle, resulting in the end consumers have to buy more than 100-200 Yuan ticket. Since the opening of the network ticketing, my own feeling is that the encounter had to resort to scalpers has been greatly reduced; In order to save money paid to the yellow cattle fare part, we have to move a small bench to the ticket office to queue up all night, although now is also queued, but at least hid in front It's better to crowd people than to move a stool. In fact, online ticketing has accounted for the current peak of the railway transport 50% of the number of tickets. The quotas for these online tickets are new, plus the original share of Bing and ticket sales, which has actually reduced the number of tickets left to scalpers and reduced the vacancy rate, which is equivalent to an objective increase in the capacity of the railwayTo give. This is the network ticketing can ease the root cause of the difficulty of buying tickets. In other words, in the premise of not increasing the total number of taxis, the most fundamental way to solve a taxi problem is to reduce the vacancy rate and increase the proportion of taxis being occupied on the road. Empty cars and waiting for people far away, the car needs to rush over to solve the resource allocation, the driver to spend the oil and time costs, in this sense, the fare increase is a voluntary allocation of resources to the driver of a compensation, reasonable fare increase should be carried out in this way. Taxi software, in fact, is a natural possibility of competition after the taxi resources have joined the market adjustment. If the market can be fully competitive, the final precipitate prices must be more reasonable than now, in line with the interests of both drivers and passengers greatest-of course, the benefits to regulators and taxi companies is not necessarily so obvious. What is certain is that if people can vote with their feet and generate a suitable ceiling for the increase, the situation will be much better. I personally believe that this final generation of greatest, must not be 50% of the fare is so expensive. But you, see the software for their own good do not want government regulation, look at the charge too much to let the government regulation, this attitude is not what cheap all want to occupy?