TechWeb Annual Cross Review browser article who is the best partner in mobile phone?

"TechWeb Report" Today, mobile phones play an indispensable role in our lives, and in our mobile phones also have an equally essential application. For example, we use the most frequent mobile browsers, but now the application flooded, how do we find the best use, the most suitable for their own applications? At this stage of the domestic mobile browser market is a fragmented, in order to compete in such a fierce mobile phone browser market to let their products stand out, the major mobile browser manufacturers have resorted to all the way, mobile browser product function is also escalating, today we will be a representative of several domestic mobile phone browser to conduct a horizontal review From the interface, basic functions, browser kernel, HTML5 compatibility, their own characteristics, as well as the recent calls for a higher number of ticket-grabbing links and other aspects of the test. • Interface & Function Drawing Note: 36,000 degrees UC Cheetah QQ said that the current mobile browser interface layout similarity is really high enough, It's hard to tell who is who from the top and bottom columns, and for easy identification, can we open our menu bar or not? Then look at the picture. Let's look at the interface first. Keep an eye on them for a few seconds. If you are also not consciously will look to the cheetah, you and small weave like to see tired of complex function stack, lightly said this is called innocence, and in fact, we have the interface of the aesthetic already "rising", we do not want to see too trivial interface, But hopefully it has all the features we need, from this point of view, I think the QQ browser do the most right, it as much as possible to simplify every icon, do not do redundant navigation items, it is difficult to visually express the function of hiding, just like "Black and white" type of visual sense, think of white paper, it seems to be a bit light. And 360, Baidu, UC seems to have chosen another idea, "anyway functional interface is needed to call out, as far as the stack function is not for the convenience of users?" "It's as if you want to achieve a function that requires only 2~3 steps, and does it look good?" he said. In fact, if the product in accordance with a certain idea can do a good job of the famous products have been stuffed with a T hard disk, so the worst result of this idea is that the user will be open the function bar to use the desire to reuse. Although not suck to die will not die, but do not make mistakes is not necessarily right. If you also have a bit of perfectionism, believe that see the cheetah's interface you must very much hope that it is good enough, because the interface pleasing to the surface of the application of rough use too much, this mentality is like shopping to see a beautiful clothes, especially want it to wear is comfortable. But comfortable and uncomfortable, it's the most streamlined one from the interface alone. We put some of the current domestic browser function into a form, we should be at a glance, but often with Safari & Chrome students see these features believe must be stunned, if this is the Chinese characteristics, not at all, because there is no foreign traffic problems, There is no flow problem there is no so-called "no map" "Province flow"A series of patterns, if the small screen mobile phone needs full-screen mode, then big screen mobile phones need to break through the problem of a single hand browsing, this is not, the page-flipping mode is born, you can go up and down through the Volume key page, like a mouse wheel, very good to achieve, use it is really convenient. Change the skin what, small weave not cold, also don't bother to change, but as for the No-trace mode, this should be to meet the "prying desire" of a group of functions, said that the function of some history, small compiled the earliest understanding of this function or in the net, but to this day, the mission of this function is still to "not be found by others" and exist. Most of the functions are as the name implies, see the name to know what it is used, but the special mention is a function called intelligent prefetching, its function is to give the strongest shield found a strongest spear, it can cache your page of other related links, such as not fully displayed article page, etc. But we know that each browser has a lot of traffic in order to save the pattern, then this function in the end is good or bad? In addition, we see that cheetah browsers do not have the most popular features in the country, visible in the beginning of the design to product positioning, external to the interface style, and other browsers are not quite the same, but there is no cloud synchronization function is a bit unreasonable, about its characteristics we later say, in this link nothing to mention, With regard to the flow of people's concern, the cheetah has not set itself so many Gougou, in other words, it is more clear positioning, in the settings provided a flow mode, but did not publicize this, as to say that the relative reduction of other models, it is necessary to the different people, after all, some of the functions are not used to, or, say, It is possible that more and more people will not use those functions, whether there is a need for existence?