Telecom tariffs are still more expensive than the United States?

Cui National Political Consultative Committee member Cui shelling High telecommunications charges (reporter Xue), the National Political Consultative Committee members Cui to the monopoly industry artillery, said China telecom tariffs expensive outrageous, and the United States in Los Angeles mobile phone charges only 9.9 dollars a year to pack. This statement immediately caused a hot discussion on the Internet, and set off the "domestic telecommunications tariffs in the end expensive" big debate.　　Experts in the line said that this shows that consumers are still not satisfied with the level of charges, telecom tariffs still have room to reduce prices. Telecom tariffs triggered hot debate recently, the National Political Consultative Committee member Cui said that telecommunications tariffs are too expensive, and opaque. "What's going on with our phone bill," he said. Which should be collected or not? "He also cited:" The United States, Los Angeles mobile phone charges are 9.9 of dollars, for a year, you believe it? He said: "You have to have a reasonable reason, let us know, call in China is so expensive, we recognize." "Then, Cui about" the United States mobile phone packs a year to collect 9.9 dollars "of the material on the network caused hot debate. At the same time, many users agree with the support, this statement has been a number of people in the line to refute. Flying Elephant net CEO Xiang said on the blog, I found in the United States the cheapest fee is almost 35 U.S. dollars monthly, can only provide simple services, and can only be used in the operator of the network.　　According to his survey, the United States, the local driver and guide, the income of the medium level, the overall rate of telecommunications charges are higher, and their average monthly telecommunications charges will cost about 100 dollars. Regulatory authorities: has been reducing China's telecommunications tariffs in the end expensive? In terms of regulatory departments and telecommunications enterprises, China's telecommunications tariff has been reduced, and the price reduction space has been small. At the beginning of this year, Zhu, chief engineer of the Ministry of Industry, said that the overall price level of telecommunications tariffs in 2009 fell by 9% on the basis of 2010 and fell 11%, most of the telecommunications pricing power has been given to enterprises and markets.　　China Mobile's chairman, Mr Wang, recently said that the basic call fee has no price elasticity and that there is less leeway to reduce prices, but there is still room for further cuts in international roaming and international data roaming charges. What is the cost of telecommunications? Why is it that consumers are still not satisfied with the reduction of their charges? Zhang, deputy director of the Information Research Department of the National Information Center, has published a report saying that although tariffs have dropped a lot, our main information products and services are still on a high level.　　For example, he said that 2009 mobile phone charges accounted for 4.77% of urban disposable income, while the proportion of rural residents disposable income is 15.9%, which reflects the high level of tariffs, international, application costs accounted for 1% of the following is easier to achieve universal service. In a website held in the "Telecommunications Fee Issue Symposium", Ministry of Industry and Telecommunications Research Institute deputy Chief engineer He Xia pointed out, in fact, mobile local access charges are not high, mainly long-distance and roaming problems.　　The billing system in countries such as the United States is relatively simple and has even canceled roaming fees. The second is that internet fees are still expensive.At a meeting recently, Ministry of Industry Minister Wei said that at present, the region's broadband tariffs are high, I hope that the communications authority to strengthen the guidance and supervision of enterprises, through the guidance of effective competition, to promote further decline in tariff levels.