The construction progress of the safeguard housing is slow by netizens

One side is the rise of commercial housing, "the king" frequency, while the construction of the security room is slow. According to media reports, the National People's Congress Standing Committee on the implementation of the housing construction project, the report shows that in the central budget for the major public investment projects, the construction of the guarantee of housing slow progress, as at the end of August only completed investment of 39.49 billion yuan, completion rate of 23.6%.　　Some places due to the lack of supporting funds and land expropriation, demolition and other preparatory work is not enough, may be difficult to complete the construction plan this year, the guarantee of the slow pace of housing construction caused the hot discussion of netizens. Where is the money for the affordable housing? The network article that signed for "Hua" pointed out that, as at the end of August, the construction of affordable housing only completed investment 39.49 billion yuan, the completion rate of 23.6%, less than 1/4, is really no money?　　I'm afraid not.　　First of all, in the country's two-year expansion of domestic demand 4 trillion yuan investment plan, 400 billion yuan will be to low-cost housing, slum upgrading and other affordable housing, an average of 200 billion yuan per year to the housing, but so far only to complete the investment of 39.49 billion yuan, where the rest of the money? Secondly, this year issued a lot of local bonds, in accordance with the requirements of the Ministry of Finance, this part of the funds to prioritize the central investment local public welfare construction projects and other difficult to attract social investment projects. Therefore, many places have indicated that the local bonds are mainly used for the security of housing projects, rural livelihood projects and rural infrastructure, etc., but the local bond issue is over, some local supporting funds are not in place, where is the money used?　　Is there a public welfare construction project that prioritizes central investment and other projects that are difficult to attract social investment? Third, the Ministry of Finance issued the "Low-rent Housing Security Fund Management measures" provisions, from the land transfer net income in accordance with the proportion of not less than 10% of the funds for Low-cost housing security. Many local land markets are booming this year, and "King of the Earth" continues to appear. By the end of September, urban land transfer in Beijing, Shanghai and other cities has exceeded the annual level of the previous two years. 2007 National land transfer income of about 1.3 trillion yuan.　　If from the land sale net income to take out 10% certainly is a very big number, then some places has not from the land transfer net income in accordance with not less than 10% proportion arranges for the low rent housing safeguard funds?　　Some netizens believe that one side is a lot of local real estate market booming, while the protection of housing construction is deserted, the protection of housing construction progress slowly, the investment completion rate is only 23.6%, I am afraid the reason is not the funds have no channel guarantee, but the lack of implementation. Housing construction Slow The main reason is not accountability signed as "Zhang Yongji" network article that, there are only two main reasons for the slow construction of the building, one is the unrealistic construction plan, beyond the capacity to bear: the second is to assume the task of building the local slack, did not complete the task as a matter of time, using the cloudy Road,　　Slide to where is the strategy. FirstSay the first reason. This year's National housing construction plan, as a major public investment projects arranged, with rigidity. In accordance with past practice, the central budgetary arrangements have been very prudent, and the implementation of the budget for the previous year has been used as a reference for all efforts to be completed.　　This year also, the release of the housing construction plan, not beyond the affordability, local progress is slow, not can not, but not also. This can only be found in the second part of the reason. To build affordable housing, there must be land, two funds, three to have impetus. If the land, the government monopolized the land level market, there is no difficulty in begging. If it is said that funding, the provision of affordable housing is only a small part of local finance, there is no problem. If the impetus is said, the government will have more advantages and have the power to co-ordinate decision-making.　　So it seems that the security of housing slow progress can only be from who to look for reasons. So who's going to sabotage it? The state issued a plan for the construction of affordable housing, and did not propose how to punish the expiration of not completed. Place is also the case, did not enact the rules of rewards and punishments, did not create pressure, the implementation of the relevant departments, progress and slow, completed well and bad, and the responsible person does not necessarily relate, such a mechanism how can produce productivity?　　If it can be treated as a GDP indicator, the effect of much more completion and less on the movements of officials will be so slow. The state's affordable housing construction plan has the seriousness, cannot want to complete, wants to complete how many. There are only two months left in the year, and in such a short time to complete the bulk of the unfinished, there must be a lot of difficulties. Because of this, it is necessary to strengthen the responsibility system, from top to bottom to make the rules of rewards and punishments, let all responsible officials carry the official hat in hand, within the stipulated time limit if not irresistible reason, should be completed in accordance with the plan of the construction of affordable housing projects, failed to complete the scheduled task, a light suspension of introspection, heavy to take off his official hat, Accountability.　　This kind of responsibility person all dare not treat lightly, the safeguard sex housing construction only then can play a turnaround. To give local governments enough incentive signed as "Pengching" network article pointed out that even the Ministry of Construction of the department has also admitted that China's current urban low-income residential families of low-cost housing system construction slow, not get due attention.　　In fact, the protection of housing profits meager, in the current land and real estate market "very lucrative" situation, whether the local government, or developers, the protection of housing is not enough incentive. For example, the land used for the construction of low-rent housing is granted by the state by way of allocation. In other words, the local government must be "free to give". Now, "Land sales" is one of the main sources of local government revenue, the higher the price, the more well-off local government.　　In this case, the protection of housing inevitably reduced to "image project." In reality, we see such a strange phenomenon. On the one hand, both the central ministries and the local authorities, in various uploaded documents, repeatedly declaredConstruction of affordable housing as the focus ", but on the other hand, a practical link, the protection of housing often wool.　　To break the pattern of "gruel" of the affordable housing, and to improve "the completion rate of affordable housing", the most important thing is to give local governments sufficient incentives. The network article named "The Nest Jianghuai" thinks, the safeguard sex housing is the Social Security "miniature". The safeguard mechanism is not perfect, the protection house must be short of bricks and tiles. In all fairness, the social security system has made considerable progress and a certain degree of improvement, but, has not reached the ideal degree, many links are still fragile. For the protection of the housing slow, "fast build order" can only be palliative, sound protection mechanism can be a permanent cure. Of course, the establishment of a sound social security mechanism is not a day of work, considering the wisdom of the Government, especially the need for the interaction between officials and intelligence.