The death of college students caused by the explosion of the TV set, second instance yesterday

About 9 o'clock last April 23, the new Pudong new district Hopewell Town Tong Dong Jie a residential 2 floor TV explosion caused a fire, this let 4 floor a university student suffocated to death. Therefore, the deceased's family of 2 floor owners and property companies to court, claims nearly 700,000 yuan.　　Yesterday, the case of the second trial in Shanghai, a Chinese court. On the day of the incident, the House 202 indoor a television set on the state of a sudden smoke fire exploded, and even caused a fire, billowing smoke caused by living in the same building 402 room of the university students Cai suffocation death. Chua's family suggested that this was 202 room residents did not take the fire measures in time to let the fire spread quickly, caused the death of Cai, the community belongs to the Cai property company itself also has a serious dereliction of duty, so the 202-room owner 奚某 and Chen and Cai Property company are sued in court, the two defendants to jointly compensate for death Indemnity, The burial expenses and the spirit consolation money were nearly 700,000 yuan. The Court of first Instance supported the plaintiff and decided that the 202-room homeowner would bear the primary responsibility, while the property company would bear 10% of the responsibility.　　After the verdict, the 202-room owner appealed. Yesterday's trial, the television manufacturers (Shenzhen Skyworth Electronics Co., Ltd.) should not be added to the defendant and the parties involved should be responsible for the size of the issue, become the focus of the case controversy. 202 Room owner's lawyer suggested that the television set is caused by the internal malfunction causes the spontaneous combustion explosion to cause the fire, they should not bear any responsibility to CAI's death. In addition, the property company is not responsible and should bear the main responsibility. In addition, the deceased Cai as a college student, but did not take the right self-help measures, itself should bear certain responsibilities.　　Chua's attorney believes that it is the TV's own fault or improper use caused spontaneous combustion explosion is still in the investigation, can not jump to conclusions; Tsai's escape failure does not mean that he has a fault, so he hopes to maintain the verdict. Another defendant, the property company, said that the property company had no right to intervene in the House of the householder, and that the owner should bear the primary responsibility. In addition, the deceased Tsai has a lack of self-help, the victims should also bear part of the responsibility.　　The property company also said it decided to accept the first instance, although it had an objection to assuming 10% of the responsibility. In view of the reluctance of the parties to mediate, the court will choose a day of sentencing.