The establishment of national commodity electronic trading platform should not be premature

National http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/38090.html "> Commodity electronic trading platform should not be hurried

With the deepening of e-commerce, the commodity electronic trading market has also flourished in China, but there are many problems exposed-speculation, speculation, the threat of financial security and so on. These issues have also aroused the concern of the State, and several consecutive laws and regulations on the regulation of commodity electronic trading market have been promulgated to regulate the operation of the commodity electronic trading market.

For the commodity electronic trading market, many experts have also made suggestions, and put forward a lot of proposals and methods. Some experts believe that the current chaos in the commodity electronic trading market is the result of scattered local commodity electronic trading market, the director of China International E-commerce Center Liu Junsheng even proposed the establishment of national commodity electronic trading platform.

I think that the top-down push of the national commodity electronic trading platform not only can not solve the problem in the market, but it may hinder the benign development of the whole market. At this stage, pushing the national commodity electronic trading platform is ineffective and unhelpful.

Why is it not valid?

Looking at the current domestic commodity electronic trading market, whether it is speculation, speculation of the "Qiong gum incident", or the folder of private escape "Huaxia commodity Stock Exchange Case", the root of the problem is that the power is too concentrated, the lack of public third-party supervision. Therefore, in order to solve the problem of the current commodity electronic trading market, the key is to establish an authoritative and effective fourth party regulatory platform outside the third party platform of the commodity electronic trading market, in order to guarantee the security of funds and fair and impartial trade.

But can the national commodity electronic trading platform guarantee fairness, fairness and transparency? The individual is not optimistic. If the establishment of state-level commodity electronic trading platform, must be a central level of the joint formation of ministries, its administrative level is high, not in the past any commodity electronic trading platform comparable. Even if there is no administrative level on the surface, the support behind it cannot be underestimated. How can such a "supermarket" be effectively regulated? At that time, rights could be more concentrated, and it would be more difficult to ensure a transparent and fair trading environment.

Take a look at the world's leading stock market, the NYSE and NASDAQ are independent operators, and are subject to the supervision and management of the US Securities and Exchange Commission. This is called checks and balances to create a public environment. Therefore, the urgent task is not to establish national commodity electronic trading platform, but to establish and improve the commodity electronic trading supervision system.

Why is that not good?

Commodity electronic transactions are different from the general cargo transactions, food, raw materials and other commodities in the specifications, grading more complex, unlike the general cargo is easy to see whether the requirements, the need for specialized procedures for identification, and storage also has a lot of restrictions, while involving high storage costs.

If the state-level commodity electronic trading platform is only positioned to solve the problem of information flow and capital flow, it is not a big problem. However, the most important factor affecting the delivery rate of commodity electronic transactions is the goods themselves in the information flow and the flow of funds. There is no professional, personal, localized customer service, not all over the logistics warehousing capabilities, national commodity electronic trading platform is difficult to achieve significant development.

However, as far as the present situation is concerned, it is unrealistic to establish a national commodity electronic trading platform with professional standards and branches all over the country. It involves the interests of all parties, not top-down a paper decree can be achieved.

Therefore, at this stage more rely on local strength, the central government from the funds and the main certification two lines to grasp, and constantly integrate the dispersed information flow, from bottom to kneading commodity electronic trading platform is the proper path.

To sum up, at this stage to push the national commodity electronic trading platform is not effective, but also useless. The author's suggestion is to combine the power of central and local to establish a transparent, impartial and effective supervision system outside the electronic trading platform, and to safeguard the healthy development of the commodity electronic trading market.