The focal point of Chengting in the Rat portal case of Carrefour

A customer submitted a case to prove bitten by a rat, claim 20,000 yuan; the defendant Carrefour denies that there are mice Chenbo (reporter Chenbo), the residents of the public, Ms. Lu said, in Carrefour shopping, was bitten by mice, Beijing Carrefour Commercial Co.　　Yesterday, the trial, Carrefour said the plaintiff's evidence can not prove that it was bitten by rats, do not agree to compensation. Case shows "left foot mouse bite" Yesterday, in the Chaoyang Court court, the plaintiff, Ms. Lu said last year, June 28, she was in Carrefour to create a good shop owner of the kitchen shop, was shot out a mouse bite left foot.　　The store staff in the chat said that there are often mice. Afterwards, the shop arranges the personnel to send her to the hospital to treat, and injected the rabies vaccine. But Ms. Lu thinks, because the mouse bites the harm extremely, caused her to cause the serious psychological and the physical burden.　　Because of this, her "preparation for pregnancy" effort in vain. Ms. Lu sued Carrefour, demanding a public apology, compensation for the loss of fees and mental damage to the comfort of 20,000 yuan. Meanwhile, Carrefour is required to carry her blood tests regularly every year.　　If the disease in the future, Carrefour also bear the corresponding responsibility.　　Yesterday, Ms. Lu's colleagues testified that on the day of the incident, Lu's left foot wound swelling and accompanied by bloodshot blood, doctors can not determine whether the mouse scratches or bites.　　Ms. Lu produced a case manual, said on the "left Foot mouse bite", is the doctor based on her statement and view the injury after the diagnosis made. The defendant said the case is not diagnosed the Carrefour agent said that Ms. Lu claimed to be bitten by rats, the store staff after understanding, stores personnel are said not to see rats and mice wounding, the store has never been a mouse and related complaints. Ms. Lu's case is written in a patient statement.　　After the incident, the two sides did not reach a consultation, Chaoyang District Association also because unable to verify, termination of mediation.　　The agent believes that Ms. Lu's evidence is not sufficient to prove that she was bitten by mice in Carrefour, and therefore does not agree to compensation. The case was not pronounced in court.