The internet age, who can hold up the operating system of this cloud?

Sometimes we find that Internet users are actually very realistic:

They only care about their own experience, not to ignore the boring concept; They only care about the application, not the system; Even they focus on office, QQ, Angry Birds, plants vs zombies, but don't care if they're using Windows7, Android, IOS or the WEB. It seems that the operating system is "equal to none" for them.

and extended to "cloud services", "cloud" for most users is a profound and difficult to understand the concept, in fact, even if the so-called "experts" also tasted. "Cloud" looks very image, but a very deep, become extremely boring and boring boring, users have to avoid and far away. In fact, they don't need to understand. Because they only need to use the same application on different devices, open the same document, this is the user's concern of the "cloud function."

Therefore, the internet-based "cloud operating system" is bound to become the darling of the cloud era. Because this is the Internet cloud operating system is the most users can perceive and accept the cloud, in order to enable users to better use features without worrying about implementation. A document that users can see everywhere this is the essence of the Internet--mailboxes, portals, search, Web site navigation, E-commerce, people like the Internet is like the internet is the "content cloud", and the corresponding cloud document is "cloud Application", and "cloud operating system." On an internet-based operating system, you use the same interface, the same application, and even the same document wherever you are.

Simply put, the Internet operating system is the Internet, cloud computing and application of a new form of integration, more accurately, the Internet operating system should be the ecosystem of the Internet. I believe that the IT industry in the operating system, the Internet, and wireless internet, after the outbreak of the Internet operating system will also explode. Internet without international, whether in China or the United States, the ability to compete for the Internet operating system "hero" must have three elements: 1. Huge user base 2. Solid Technical Foundation 3. Huge user capacity to pay. Users are the core, technology is to ensure that users pay is the whole ecosystem can continue to drive, these three indispensable.

As mentioned earlier, the Internet operating system is also an "ecosystem" in which users are consumers, developers are producers, and technology is the necessary material and nutrients, equivalent to air and water. From this point of view, it is not difficult to find that the number of players can be delineated. There are probably only Facebook, Apple and Google in foreign countries, because they have huge users, innovative technology and huge revenue capabilities, and they have proved successful. Facebook's open platform, Apple's App Store, and Google's Android have become the first choice for users and developers.

At home, Internet operating system This new Internet ecology is just beginning. Who can accomplish this milestone in comparison to the mature American model? Which one of the "bats360" five big city-states (Baidu, Ali, Tencent, Sina and 360)?

(Data from the Internet, visible http://news.cnblogs.com/n/99015/)

is Baidu? Baidu turned to the platform for a long time, from the box to the browser to the mobile phone operating system, Baidu has been chasing the internet development of the Waves, box calculation does box A lot of developers, and in the browser, there is no agency for Baidu's share of the browser has made a statement, Baidu is trying. However, the author is more interested in Baidu's mobile operating system, regardless of success or failure, which represents the vision of Baidu, but also represents the progress of China's Internet, are worthy of congratulation. If Baidu catches this rare development opportunity, it is possible to become one of the bigger spaces, winning over the Internet in a longer dimension.

What about Taobao? Taobao also has a large number of users, excellent technology and strong "user pay" ability, but also launched Taobao Cloud platform and Aliyun mobile phone, but I have another view. The Internet ecosystem, the real consumer goods should be "service" rather than a pair of socks or a sweater is not a charge, to pay a hydropower, more importantly, Taobao users are actually not completely Taobao users, but Taobao registered ID, the real meaning of all Taobao sellers users. Of course, rely on "pay treasure" payment convenience, Ali department or give people infinite reverie, but Ali will become a payment pipeline or payment terminal, also need time to do inspection.

What about Tencent? It seems that all Internet topics will not be able to evade Tencent, because regardless of user, technology or user's ability to pay, Tencent can make people's imagination. Moreover, Tencent has never missed any feast, this time is no exception, Tencent has come up with dry goods: q+ open platform. It's not hard to notice that WEBQQ's friends are not too difficult to find in, now the WEBQQ has become q+web, and q+ also launched the desktop version. For developers and users, regardless of q+web or q+ desktop, you do not care, both from the bottom through, the development of applications and operating methods are no different. Tencent has become a pioneer in the Internet operating system, and it is understood that both the number of applications and the user active program, q+ do well.

Say again Sina. If it were three or two years ago, there would certainly not have been too many people to classify Sina as an internet company, because it was more like a "digital media" company, which did not meet the elements of the previous Internet operating system, whether users, technology or revenue. Now the only one that can put her on the list may be the microblogging and SAE platform, but the two only solve the user and phased technical problems, compared to the more difficult user revenue, Sina has a long way to go. If Sina's media attributes are left behind, its microblog is only an analogy to Twitter abroad, and it is too early to define Sina as a new internet competitor if it is not the same as Facebook, Apple and Google.

Similarly, all Internet topics cannot be bypassed by 360. For 360 of the new strong players, users, technology and profit is not a problem, and it has also launched 360 desktop, with a generation of Internet operating system. However, 360 of the free mode compared to Tencent's user fees, is a short board, how to solve the problem of payment to be further discussed. And, from the current point of view, the 360 desktop is more like a desktop beautification tool upgrades, how to ensure that developers profit and users active, 360 will take a long way.

So Matthew's theory still works. The future of China's Internet cloud will still be a single large, this is the user choice platform of the inevitable result. And this one will be who, will ultimately be the user to decide, but the platform is the king of the victory in service, I believe that the 2012 Internet will be more exciting. Whichever is the first to get this ticket to the "cloud", we should applaud him.