The jurisdiction moved to Shandong Huayang Science and Technology equity dispute is now "connecting"

Due to objections, Huayang science and technology incumbent large shareholder Huayang Group and the reorganization of the Manhattan group lawsuit will be moved to the High Court in Shandong province to deal with.　　I do not know whether the defendant Huayang group and Ningyang state-funded bureau will be the case to the "base camp" for the trial and occupy the "advantage." Huayang Technology today disclosed that the company received the holding shareholder Huayang Group 14th written notice, the Heilongjiang provincial high people's Court on July 8 issued the relevant civil adjudication, and on July 13 served Ningyang County State Bureau, on the plaintiff Harbin Manhattan Multivariate Group Co., Ltd. and the defendant Huayang Group,　　Ningyang County State Capital Bureau Equity transfer dispute case, determined as follows Huayang group and Ningyang County State-funded Bureau of the objections to the establishment of jurisdiction, the case will be transferred to the higher People's Court in Shandong province. Huayang Science and Technology equity dispute was first announced May 19 this year. The Manhattan group in Heilongjiang High Court requested Huayang Group, Ningyang County State-funded bureau will be used without authorization to return the 50 million yuan to the designated account, and pay liquidated damages, travel expenses and lawyer agency fee of 100,000 yuan. More crucially, the Manhattan Group requested Huayang Group, Ningyang County State-funded bureau to continue to the 3.31 yuan/share contract price of the implementation of the equity transfer contract. And according to the Huayang Group was responsible for equity negotiations, said the contradictions of the focus of the Huayang group is not in accordance with the original negotiated 3.31 yuan/share of the price of the transfer of equity.　　Because in the relevant acquisition intention after the issue, Huayang technology two market share price soared, once reached over 10 yuan, and Huayang group in the two-tier market is also a large reduction in shareholding rights, the profits are not cheap. From the plaintiff's point of view, Huayang group not only not to fulfill the previous signing of the equity transfer agreement, but also misappropriation of security deposit, you can say "completely wrong." And earlier media reports, according to people familiar with the matter, the two sides of the transfer of equity is mainly with the Ningyang County government negotiations, the initiative in the hands of the Ningyang County government, although it has been said that the cooperation with Manhattan unchanged, but the transfer of equity has not progressed. Some legal persons have pointed out that the determination of the transfer price requires a written agreement. If both parties have prior written confirmation of the price, the assignor must comply with the stipulated price.　　Unless there is evidence to prove that the said contract is invalid. According to the general principle of "plaintiff on the defendant", the jurisdiction objection was ruled by the court, which means that the case can be transferred to the defendant's seat and the case is decided, whether this will bring favorable conditions for the defendant Huayang Group and Ningyang County state capital.