The land ministry insists that the land price ratio is about 25%

The Ministry of Land announced a real estate project survey results, claiming that "land prices accounted for 15%-30%, the average is 23.2%, so the land price is not pushing up the final factor of housing prices."　　"But the market does not seem to agree with this, and real estate developers are the most offensive."　　In this connection, Chao Song, director of land Research and Planning Institute of China's Ministry of Lands, published an article yesterday at present, the three sets of data about land price ratio in the market, although the purpose is different, the scope of investigation is different, the data source is different, the data caliber also has some differences, but the three groups of data in the land price proportion of the ratio of the difference is not small, are in 25% or so　　According to the introduction, the three sets of data are the Ministry of national territory for the country's 105 cities a number of project survey data (23.2%), the Ministry of land in 2008 city land Price Monitoring results (25.8%) and the Chamber of Commerce in January issued the "China Real Estate Enterprise Development Cost Analysis" report (58.2%). Chao Song said that the 58.2% mentioned in the Federation report refers to the ratio of land cost to direct cost, which does not include tax and profit, so it has nothing to do with land price ratio.　　In fact, although there is no direct reference to the price ratio of land price in the Federation report, according to the data provided by the association, it is estimated that the value of the land price ratio of the surveyed samples should be 23%-26%.　　But in Hua Yuan Group President Ren Zhiqiang, the study actually made a mistake, that is, static calculation of the initial price of land supply, measuring the proportion of land to house prices is not scientific, and can not really reflect the relationship between house prices and land price, because holding land requires a lot of costs. He said that in the calculation of land prices, can not simply calculate the price of the sale, but also take into account the various taxes and restrictions on land sales caused by the changes in land prices.　　For example, the cost of land one-time payments, land use tax, and planning for community services in a variety of infrastructure and supporting areas. In this regard, Chao Song said that only the price of land prices than this technical data, the debate is meaningless, because the price of land prices than in the end is not a reasonable number of conclusions. She suggested that the establishment of a "land price control publicity, cost profit at a glance" mechanism.