The mind of the electric donkey and the spirit of cool 6

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest stationmaster buy cloud host technology Hall

Although the title seems to be related to the electric donkey and cool 6, but what I actually want to say is to share the idea of open source with a kind of selfish, plagiarism. I chose the donkey as the representative of the share mainly because we can almost find what we want on the electric donkey, and the idea of choosing cool 6 as selfish is mainly because it marks its own logo on the video. The Web2.0 era should be an era of sharing.

Web2.0 is an era of sharing, sharing is a pleasure, and many blogs follow the Creative commons agreement "signed-non-commercial-consistent", which means that it can be used for non-commercial purposes with full respect for the original author. Since1984 recently revealed that he has a lot of articles stolen by the Visual China, the latter also blatantly advertised the original, used in commercial use, you should at least mark the source of the work? Is this going to make people angry?

Baidu Space and Sina blog is another selfish blog hosting, why say so? If you subscribe to a blog with Baidu space or Sina blog you will find a lot of pictures can not be displayed, replaced by a write "the picture from Baidu space" or "the picture is only used for Sina blog users exchange and communication" such pictures. If the image is Sina blog or Baidu Space where the original works, in such a way to protect us will not have objections, but the problem is that the picture is not a copyrighted picture, and the owner of the picture is willing to share with others, what is the reason to use the picture anti-theft chain technology?

The use of pictures anti-theft chain technology is mainly for traffic, but this and web2.0 thought out of place, Baidu Space and Sina blog These two shining through China today's web2.0 site one of the community, why not to integrate the spirit of web2.0?

An electric donkey is a software that follows the GPL protocol, and anyone can make any changes to the software, but the modified software must follow the GPL protocol. And the user of the donkey, in most, there is a shared spirit, if there is no such spirit, the electric donkey can not become the most resources of an aggregation area, we could almost find on the electric donkey we could not find in Google's old record, the 1988 Formula Car video and so on.

So I think that the idea of electric donkey is the originator of web2.0 thought.

Many people may have used Vagaa, it can download the donkey file, I have already uninstalled it early, because it does not follow the GPL protocol, the use of other people's code is not open source. The second is that it did a shameful dirty thing, Vagaa used the emule Compat v0.40 this false version number to deceive the donkey server, so the donkey server issued a large number of inquiries, resulting in some of the donkey server paralysis. Finally, no sex! Downloading is much faster than uploading. This and read the sutra without a monk a reason, serious breach of the peer-to-peer spirit.

In the age of web2.0, we can be selfish, selfish, everyone has selfish, there is not willing to share things with others. But on the other hand we should have the spirit of sharing, information is the world's people, should not be held in the hands of a few.

Why do I choose cool 6 as a selfish representative? Because it was in the video with the Ku6 logo (I do not want to use cool 6, because it is not familiar with it, but because today just saw a video on it). In fact, the domestic video sharing site has done so, I really can not understand their practice, sharing video is not their own copyright works, the original author did not carry out any copyright instructions, cool 6 also help the author to play a copyright logo? And the copyright also points to Ku6! YouTube video does not do this, but it is very successful, it is worth the domestic video site learning.

Not only in video sharing, but in picture sharing, many of the domestic photo album services in the user upload photos after the name of their own album, a watermark, one of the expectations is to bring new users, some sites even in screen shots and other pictures on the engraved on a watermark, but the view of foreign famous album services have not done so, But they have more users than at home, and the reason is obvious.

The original author modifies the image to add copyright that we can all accept that this is a kind of respect, but we are obviously unacceptable to these service providers.

Do not share no one will complain you, you have such rights, but in this web2.0 era, sharing is a trend, not sharing is a kind of outdated. But one thing must be clear, sharing is not to bring plagiarism, steal, but to change a noun, reproduced, in full respect for the original author of the situation reproduced information.

It is hoped that a true web2.0 era will emerge in China.