The net exposes the Blue Moon whitening agent may the carcinogenic whitening agent standard formulation unreasonable

"China Business Network comprehensive report" well-known counterfeiters Wang Hai and washing industry big guy "Blue Moon" battle has lasted for a year, so far both sides have not yet been divided. According to the health of China News Network, starting from June 20, 2011, the professional anti-counterfeiting Wang Hai, said in a series of tweets that the blue Moon contains fluorescent whitening agent carcinogenic. The blue moon to Wang Hai infringement of the right to the reputation of the court.　　July 8, 2011, Guangzhou Huangpu District entertained the blue Moon v. Wang Hai reputation right dispute case. December 2011, the Guangzhou Huangpu District People's Court to the Blue Moon sued the professional anti-counterfeiting man Wang Hai case conducted a first-instance sentence, the court found that Wang Hai in micro-Bo published false statements constitute honorary infringement, ordered Wang immediately stop the Blue moon reputation infringement, delete its microblog on the false remarks, and through the Sina News Center published a statement,　　To the Blue Moon apology, compensation Blue Moon eliminate the impact cost 100,000 yuan. However, according to the market leader reported that Wang Hai believes that the Blue Moon case of the first instance of the verdict cannot withstand scrutiny. At the end of December 2011, Wang Hai filed an appeal, requesting a decree to revoke the original judgment and dismiss the enterprise's claim.　　At present, the dispute between the two sides of the right of reputation is in the second instance. According to the Health China News Network, in the debate, the Blue Moon is always moving out of the industry standard "qb/t2953-2008 detergent fluorescent brightener" to show that its products are qualified, and these statements are ultimately recognized by the court, the industry standards have become a key to the success of this series of cases. Recently, however, Hangzhou residents have raised objections.　　People who pay more attention to many social problems Zhang Renguang pointed out that including "detergent fluorescent brightener", including many national standards, industry standards, its formulation process, the consumer participation rights, discourse rights have not been effectively realized, this in the formulation of procedures exist defects standards, from the date of birth is "congenitally deficient."　　Wang pointed out that the fluorescent agent industry standards for the formulation and implementation of only a few years from now, it can be confirmed that detergent added "fluorescent Whitening agent" safety problem has not been long-term research and practice.　　Public query, has been a lot of product standards, by a small number of experts, leading enterprises to control, which has become a universal standard-setting problem. Consumers said that many of the problems in the final analysis is a standard problem, but many of our standards, in fact, not "standard", unfair, unfair, unscientific, and not advanced.