The new day was immediately traced to false propaganda.

Recently, Wuchuan industry and Commerce launched a crackdown on IPR infringement action, strict search electric cars, motorcycles, non-flammable and other stores within the infringement of well-known trademarks. It is the responsibility of the local business sector to protect intellectual property rights from infringement, and the public expects the action to be a cautionary tale, even if the role is limited to the local. Survey, Wuchuan industry and commerce found that the electric vehicle industry in the publicity has a lot of problems. such as the new Day electric car stores posted "Four consecutive annual sales of the world's first", "China's top ten brands" words and logos, but failed to provide reasonable basis for the industry and commerce, was accused of false propaganda; The electric car did not get "China well-known trademark" title, but in its façade before playing a huge "China well-known trademark immediately electric car" signs. If the brand false propaganda is true, will be fined 1.2 million yuan. -Southern Rural newspaper reporter Wei Industry and commerce  merchants do not have the evidence "in accordance with the protection of intellectual property rights issued by superior documents, recently we launched a special rectification action, crackdown on false trademarks, alongside brand names and false publicity." December 13, Wuchuan, director of the seaside Gong, said to the southern Rural newspaper reporter. The director of Liang introduced: "As of now, we inspected two motorcycle stores, did not detect any problems, but there are more problems in the electric car stores, the electric car stores in front of the door impressively hit a ' China well-known trademark ' big vertical card, after we verify that its brand is not a ' China well-known trademarks '. "Another brand new day, it is really a ' China well-known trademark ', but the merchant at the same time with ' four consecutive annual sales of the world's first ', ' China Top ten brands ' and so on publicity, according to its said these are found on the Internet, we call the merchant to provide evidence, but the other side has not been out. "said Director Liang. Business  Online has the relevant information to the industry and commerce to check, Wuchuan New Day electric car store boss feel a little injustice. "China's top ten electric car brands, online there ah, New Day is inside." I also wonder how the Internet, why manufacturers can not provide evidence to me. "As for the" four consecutive annual sales of the world's first, "the boss said," This is also introduced on the Internet, I just took this to play a very small logo. " "We only opened this shop for about one months, the electric cars did not sell the number of cars and commerce to check the false advertising this matter." "New Day electric car store owner told reporters. Reporter immediately in Baidu input "China's top ten electric car brand", find relevant results of about 1.6 million, a variety of websites, institutions ranked "China's top ten electric car brands" a wide range. In addition, the New Day "four consecutive annual sales of the world's first" in some sites have also introduced, but no one site can provide the basis for relevant data. But the new day for "China's top ten brands," "Four consecutive annual sales of the world's first" on the official website of the new Day did not introduce. As for another to be looked at the brand immediately, the reporter repeatedly tried to dial Wuchuan immediately the owner of the electric car store related to Mr. Chen's mobile phone, but has been in the shutdown state. Factory  is actively to verify the above electric car brand stores were accused of false propaganda, the reporter called two companies related to the responsible person. December 16New Japan Electric vehicle brand PR director Chen Kaiya sent a reply to say: "About Wuchuan New Day electric car store in the façade posted in the ' National Top ten Brands ', ' four consecutive annual sales of the world's first ' (alleged false propaganda), I am actively seeking to verify that, if there is a matter, I will be ordered to rectify the individual improper publicity behavior. "As for electric cars, the reporter repeatedly called the company's brand department, but the wiring staff said the brand department responsible for not to be interviewed." Subsequently, the reporter sent the interview letter to each other, to press, immediately the electric car company still did not respond to the incident. The lawyer  violates the legal discretion punishment according to "the People's Republic of China Anti Unfair Competition Law" 21st Article 1th paragraph stipulates, if the operator uses advertisements and other methods to make misleading false advertisements on commodities, the supervision and Inspection Department shall order the cessation of the Illegal act and the elimination of the impact, and may, according to the circumstances, be fined at least 200,000 yuan below 10,000 yuan. But some lawyers pointed out that "not necessarily fined 10,000 yuan to 200,000 yuan so much". "The law says that ' according to the circumstances of more than 10,000 yuan or more than 200,000 yuan under the fine ', if the plot is relatively light can be penalized a little or no penalty, the specific circumstances according to the value of the sale of goods and profits to be determined. Guangzhou lawyer told reporters. Mr Fung, in Guangzhou, said: "Immediately the electric car is not well-known trademarks in China, but in its stores to play ' China well-known trademarks ', the qualitative is mainly false propaganda, although it violates the" trademark law "of the relevant regulations, but has not been ' China well-known trademark ' special person's prosecution, if in accordance with the trademark law It is not sufficient to make the relevant punishment. ”