The payment is paid for the other people to pay Tang June "fake mortgage case" pending prosecution

Everything seems to be in the process of calming down. The new owner of the Boking mansion is trying to reopen the once-rotten business building. The building, located in the heart of Suzhou's Wujiang, was greeted by a large buyer such as Tang June, the president of Xinhua Group, in 2009, easing the financial crisis, and also because of the mortgage of Tang June and other people, in 2010 involved in a billion-dollar "fake mortgage" case, again into a predicament. (See this newspaper July 23, the front page of "huge loans to the underground" Tang June was involved in the Bo-Jing Building is not) the public prosecutors investigating the case is also cautious. Suzhou Procuratorate said the case has been returned to the Wujiang Procuratorate, and the case is divided into "loan" part and "usury", "falsely open value-added tax invoices" section.　　Among them, and Tang June related "loan" part, by the Wujiang Procuratorate to the original developer Sheng MoU issued a "no prosecution decision book."　　and Jiangsu Province Public Security Bureau to give the case of public saying, called this "false mortgage" as "new economic crime."　　As the undercurrent in the process of calm, the prosecution's "no prosecution decision", the first clear disclosure of Tang June in the suspected funds of the "loan" case, not by his own payment down payment and loans, mortgage will not be true to the verdict. This conclusion, and Tang June's investment in the doubt coincide.　　This newspaper earlier investigation learned that its investment in the Bo Beijing building doubtful, including suspected "a room for more sales", the purchase occurred when the land and building properties are still in the seizure state, and even Tang June and the other 7 buyers there is a mutual repayment record. "This is a typical ' borrow head ' practice, is to borrow false purchase behavior to take bank credit, is the mortgage review link especially need to be vigilant practice, the risk is very big."　　"A foreign bank letter auditor who declined to be named said that in this case the total amount of loans reached 147.29 million yuan, the first payment is about tens of millions of yuan, after the completion of the loan developers can get nearly billion funds" thirst. " False mortgage of the dark angle by the Wujiang Procuratorate July 20 issued to the original developer of Wujiangboking mansion, "No prosecution opinion", April 10, 2009 to July 15, Sheng MoU with Wang, including Tang June and other 8 relatives signed 15 Bo Beijing building purchase contract,　　And by the king to pay all the first payment and monthly, to 8 buyers in a joint-stock bank in Suzhou branch of the mortgage loans, the total loan reached 147.29 million yuan.　　In all loans, Tang June 1 People's loans amounted to 6, the amount of 112.85 million yuan. Among them, the most important prosecution decided that "by the king to pay all the first payment and monthly payments."　　According to our correspondent, this detail behind the evidence shows that in Tang June and other home buyers to complete the loan, then by the king of the tens of millions of head of the payment directly back to the home buyer account. According to the previous investigation of this newspaper, Boking mansion in Tang June and other people's purchase point is in the land and property was seized state. Moreover, before the seizure, Tang June bought a 1-6-storey shop has been a transaction, until Tang June's purchase, the 6-storey property right is still in the hands of others.　　After that, including Tang June, many buyers have a record of mutual repayment, many doubts.　　This prosecution decision on Non-prosecution also has a clear description of the motives and means of the crime, the purpose of this is to buy a company, the way is "sales of the company's Bo Beijing mansion, and then to the bank to deal with the way the mortgage loans, in order to solve the company's financial problems."　　"No prosecution decision book" revealed that Tang June and other people's 15 purchase contracts are not in the Wujiang Construction Bureau network signed the record.　　According to the views of the banking system unrelated to the case, the same source of the first payment and repayment of the source, coupled with the failure to record the purchase contract, has been to a large extent can be judged to be a buyer and developers of collusion between the fake mortgage behavior. But after the qualitative, the prosecution made the decision not to prosecute the developers.　　The relevant bank self-examination also stressed that Tang June related purchase procedures intact, and so far monthly supply, bank loans did not suffer losses.　　A well-known lawyer in Jiangsu Province, said that developers use false contracts to defraud bank loans to ease the pressure on the situation is more common, when the amount is not large, more to whether to continue to repay the judge basis, whether there is a solvency is also an important criterion for recognition. According to our correspondent understand, this "no prosecution decision" is the case in the procuratorial phase of the final determination of the results, all prosecution procedures have been completed.　　In the case of two other related charges "suspected of false discount invoices" and "usury" and so has done caregiver treatment, the specific results may be settled in September.　　Although the prosecution process has gone, the case is still a certain variable, if the public security organs do not recognize this result, you can take the "no prosecution relief measures" to apply for reconsideration.　　The controversial parties to the "new type of crime" are now disputing the direction of the case.　　In March this year, the investigation detachment of Suzhou after the case, the transfer of Wujiang Procuratorate. In the indictment, the police identified the case as "fraudulent loans for usury loan cases", the initial determination of the purchase of commercial premises contract is a false contract, involving an amount of 112.85 million yuan.　　According to the credit information obtained by our correspondent, Tang June bought a six-storey shop in Beijing in July 2009, with an area of 17922.77 square meters and a total contract price of 225.76 million yuan. But prosecutors and the police have seen some differences. May 14, the prosecution returned the case to police supplementary investigation. It is understood that the main content of supplementary investigation is "whether to cause huge losses, and meet the standard."　　In April 2010 and July 2010, prosecutors also extended the time to review prosecutions twice for the same reason.　　Wujiang Procuratorate of the relevant people to this reporter explained that the hospital to make no prosecution conclusion is an important reason is "so far repayment normal." "According to the law of the Supreme Court and the Supreme Prosecutor's Office, the loan case is a result of a crime, and the criterion of whether or not it is a crime is whether it causes great loss and if it does not reach a certain standard, it is not a loan."　　said the person concerned. AThe lawyer of Jiangsu famous lawyer says, the difference of "loan" between this qualitative and public security is that an important criterion of the loan case is whether to take illegal possession as the aim, and "generally speaking, whether the break is the most significant criterion for illegal possession". "The criminalization of the amount of crime may also be a means of compromise with reality." "A person in the banking regulatory system said that the current in the field of housing, developers to fake contracts to deal with false mortgages, fraud bank loans to ease the pressure of capital is not uncommon phenomenon." "These behaviors, borrowers and developers are generally false mortgage informed and conspiracy, if not the amount of bank losses as a standard, it may be difficult to identify."　　"But the lawyer also said that without screening, these" fake mortgages "are like a mine in the Chinese banking system. In March this year, Beijing has a similar case was sentenced-the "China 400 Rich List," the Schegenrong from the construction bank to defraud a loan of 660 million yuan, was sentenced to life imprisonment, and confiscation of the entire property of the individual, and the crime of illegal loans, illegal issuance of financial tickets sentenced to the President Genlin 20 years Zhao, vice president, was sentenced to 19 years.