The proportion of responsibility should be clarified

If a traffic accident is all a pedestrian fault, the motor vehicle only bears a small amount of responsibility. So according to the fault responsibility size to assume different proportion of compensation discipline, has been widely recognized, highlighting the fairness and impartiality. In the crackdown on online sales of fake action, the same should distinguish between the responsibility ratio, the board in Taobao and other online platform, obviously unfair.


&http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/37954.html ">nbsp; First, avoid sweeping. Can not because Taobao has fakes, and the conclusion that it is allowed to fake. Taobao for consumers to the bottom of the above is the benefits outweigh the disadvantages, or more harm than good, should be the market to decide. The rapid growth of Taobao, sales beyond the Hundred, Wal-Mart, enough to show that it has been recognized by most people. The consumer's eyes are discerning. If the shopping experience on Taobao is so unbearable, consumers will certainly choose to vote with their feet. Taobao, a platform that has grown up in a free competition environment, will soon drown in the market. Therefore, Taobao anti-counterfeiting should not be a kind of his behavior, and more should be in order to survive to consider the emergence of self-discipline behavior.


as a sales platform, Taobao of course should be done in advance to check, after the responsibility for consumer rights. However, if the responsibility can not be clarified, it is unfair to throw too much responsibility on Taobao. It is often said that "the source of counterfeiting", in law, the demand for fake producers to bear more responsibility than the seller. and the responsibility of direct sellers should be higher than the E-commerce platform such as Taobao. In fact, the proliferation of fakes in E-commerce platform, but also to be divided into two situations. One is not know is false, strayed into the trap. The rights and interests of such consumers should be upheld. Another is to search for fakes, know fake buy fake. International big-name only sell dozens of yuan, is the purchaser really so stupid? Such consumption behaviour itself is flawed and should be despised. More importantly, the end of the fight against counterfeiting should be the responsibility of the relevant government departments. Faced with a variety of goods, we have to admit that fake, counterfeit is a technical life. Taobao should do is to check the prior inspection of the corresponding license of the merchant, afterwards help the customer rights protection. Taobao as a platform to fully consider the interests of customers, so that customers on Taobao consumption, can be complained and prosecuted. Taobao should also establish a sound compensation mechanism, to do the protection mechanism convenient and simple. Especially for those who have been complained of the sellers, Taobao should be given full attention, with a clear logo to prompt customers, or even the method of closing the shop.


In addition, it is also to see how the fake E-commerce platform to create a profit. As the saying goes, the greater the power, the greater the responsibility. How much you should take responsibility for your share of the deal. However, we know that Taobao has not yet established a profitable business model?


can understand is, for the public, will fake the board hit Taobao body is also a helpless choice. Looking for manufacturers, sellers is not easy, please government departments to safeguard the "mood". "Moving" the relevant department of the possibility of protecting rights is so slim, far less than the hope in Taobao and other E-commerce platform to come to reality.


so many, no wonder Alibaba Group board chairman Ma Yun for "Taobao sell leave" report to be excited to cry.