The real effect of buying a full HD TV is not that Amazon China was indicted against appeals

Mr. Zhao bought a TV labeled "Full HD" in Amazon, but after using it, he found that the effect of the screen was not "Full HD". Mr Zhao sued Amazon China for this and demanded a return of 3 times times the compensation. The first instance court decision supports Mr. Zhao's lawsuit request. Amazon China refuses to appeal. Yesterday, the reporter learned that the city of three Chinese court is hearing the case.

November 13, 2013, Zhao bought a 24-inch Panasonic LCD TV in Amazon China, costing 999 yuan. According to the website's annotation, the product is "Full HD LED LCD TV ... With large-capacity USB media playback function, can be a large picture of high-grade quality for the whole family to share more wonderful content, physical resolution to achieve 1920x1080.

After receiving the goods, Mr. Zhao found that the quality of the TV's picture did not achieve his expected effect, "I have a high-definition film on this TV, but I feel the image is not clear."

Mr Zhao believes that the Amazon China site has already marked the TV as "Full HD" and that, literally, the video should be in any way a high-definition image, but that is not the case. Mr. Zhao will be the operator of the Amazon China Beijing Century Excellence Information Technology Co., Ltd. and Tianjin branch to sue Chaoyang court. Mr. Zhao claims that the Amazon China website has made the same propaganda as the television instructions, exaggerated the quality of the product, the sale of fraud in the process, the demand for the century outstanding company compensation for 2997 Yuan.

Century distinguished company that its procurement of products for the formal legal channels, the site's propaganda and manufacturers of propaganda is consistent, there is no fraudulent behavior.

Chaoyang court heard that, judge whether the TV through the USB side of the video playback can achieve high-definition effect, must be identified through professional institutions. Identification of the onus of proof on one side of the century distinguished company. After the court proposed and explained this issue, Century Excellence Company does not apply for identification, it should bear the burden of proof, the court as the TV through the USB side can not achieve high-definition video playback. December 18, 2014, the court of First Instance judgment century outstanding company refund payment 999 yuan, and make 3 times times compensation, namely 2997 yuan.

The Chinese side of the Amazon appealed to the city's three central court. March 4 This year, the city three Chinese court hearing the case, has not yet made a second trial sentence. Reporter Zhang