The search engine likes the original not necessarily to your website benefit

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

I am also a station novice, see a lot about the optimization of the article, one of the most important point is to request original, but I do stand for some time, and other questions about optimization I can also recognize, on the original this I very disagree.

Often I worked to write the original film, but it is reproduced are included, but my own site is not published at all, as if my article is copied, the weight of the station reproduced on the contrary is found to be original.

We can search in Baidu and Google how to optimize the site-five months to build PR4 site, the original address to my site to see, but we look, Baidu and Google, as included in the reproduced, I have not included in the original 2 days.

My station is also a lot of original articles, but as long as the weight of high collection went, then my article do not want to be included, even if included, also in 10 pages later. I do not know the search engine, is the broken spider crawling over the time, in addition to see if there is no new content, whether to review the old content published time, to see if there has been included in the publication than here late, I estimate that the rotten spider is not wasting this time, the search engine development team will not waste time studying this.

So, is it useful to be original?

So how do we update our website if it doesn't work?

In fact, painstaking writing an original time, can pick a lot of articles, we can find the weight of lower than our website, to copy his original, then the search engine should also be the default is our original it, although I am not sure, but I tried, still very effective.

What, is it immoral to say so? I leave a reprint address Ah, you said he finally sent an original, spiders do not eat, it is not a waste, so I pick, and retain the original address, to the spider to build a bridge, on his website is also advantageous, you heroes, you say that?

I for everyone, everyone for me, what to say is wrong, please correct me, thank you.

The article for the author of the original, copyright-ding letter to the AU all, reproduced please specify the source: www.geifubao.com, do not do as tort, thank you for your cooperation.