May 11 This year, I in the "Northwest it Salon" in the third phase of the SEO said a word: "Do garbage station will use garbage practice", attracted a burst of laughter, but do not know that after a laugh, whether you really can grasp the meaning of it.
My point of view is "not worth the law": what is not worth doing is not worth doing well.
The network is filled with a variety of garbage stations, collection, replication, follow suit ... Countless, but this I feel very normal, there is no such a bubble exists, the network is not so lively, as the nature of the chain of living, seemingly contrary to the laws of survival is in fact an orderly natural law. I think that is not normal, many people do this one or more garbage stations, but also poured a lot of energy, optimization, beautification, promotion, and finally ended in failure.
I used to collect and collect and write regular level to achieve almost no, but I never waste energy, general step, data, templates after simple processing, immediately released, and then put aside to let it fend for themselves. Because I think it is not worth doing, then it is not worth spending more time on it to do better.
This is just an example, there are too many things are not worth doing, if you want to try it, but it is not worth doing well.
By contrast, SEO does not deserve more.
A friend told me, he knew So-and-so person, spend money to buy a variety of http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/31881.html "> Mass software, daily hair how many hours." I think it's funny, is that necessary? Know a few friends, want a few links; nothing to write original articles, plus one or two links, bubble Industry forum, blog, when the issue of views naturally generated some links. So down, I think from the outside the chain angle, is not any one kind of mass software can compare.
Long ago, the early white hat SEO on the call, Mass is a violation of search engine rules. The predecessors summed up, with time, money summed up, we can very simple to avoid these things are not worth doing, but there is always someone willing to do it, but also want to do it well, to go back to the old road, spending time and energy, financial resources, and finally came to the conclusion: the original is really like this.
In addition to links, there are a lot of things are not worth doing, opportunistic can get a moment of benefit, but its negative effects also like my two days ago in the lance principle of the article said, once the search engine changes, the impact on the site will be fatal.
We can totally do it before do a feasibility analysis, not worth doing, choose not to do or do not put too much energy to do, the main focus on the things to do, step, every step forward, are to lay a foundation for the site, improve a weight, why not?
PS: The state is not good today, nonsense a few words, or that sentence, experience to share to heart.
Author: Si Shu
The SEO theory of the Shu: not worth the law
Copyright, reprint must be linked to the form of the author and the original source and retain this statement.