The strategy of stone scissors cloth to tease netizens

Scientists found that stone scissors Bugeo strategy to draw netizens ridicule voice: too great discovery ... This is the reason why Nobel didn't dare to set a maths prize; it is a great scientific discovery. Chinese scientists discover winning strategies through experiments the researchers at Zhejiang University, Zhejiang Business University and the Institute of Theoretical Physics of CAS published a study that found a winning strategy for stone scissors. If you beat your opponent's scissors with a stone, the next round you can not go out of the stone, but should be a pair of scissors, because the other side is likely to cloth. It is understood that the researchers recruited 360 students, divided them into six groups, randomly paired to play 300 rounds of stone scissors game, in each round of students will win a small amount of renminbi award. By observing the strategies used by students, they found the game strategy used by the winner or loser. In short, if you lose your scissors to your opponent's stone, you are more likely to have a stone-winning cloth in the next round, and if you are the winner, you are more likely to follow the same shot in the next round. That's the way the researchers sum up the winners who keep the status quo losers from making changes. Stone Scissors Cloth Winning strategy is: If you are the loser, the next rotation can beat the opponent's shot, if you are the winner, the next round will not use the original shot. In other words, you beat your opponent's scissors with a stone, then you can't go out of the stone again, but you should get the scissors, because the other side is likely to be out of cloth. Zong (Source: Peninsula Network-Peninsula Metropolis Daily) An extremely simplified technology report detonated netizens ' collective ridicule of Chinese scientists. Even after many media have found out the original thesis, it is proved that this is a serious academic problem, and can not eliminate people's doubts and even abuse. And whatever the value of this report, at least it can be seen: only to express without seeking empirical evidence, it is one of the morbid of the current social impetuous disease. You can express dissatisfaction with the fickleness of the scientific community, but before you conclude that other people's research is rubbish, why not examine your speech for the scientific spirit?