The technical ape's high attitude is disgusting.

Technical apes are arrogant, arrogant, irresponsible. Why do you say that? It takes a certain amount of courage to discuss this issue and to assume a certain amount of risk of being despised, and some boring attacks. Because this is simply caused by a inaction of the war, like win and Linux war, each said the rational. To discuss this topic, because I found that the work over the years, often by the technology has been unable to work, the technical ape is almost like in the market and gradually opposed to the general.

In name, Win has played Linux for more than 20 years. In this battlefield, the technical ape always feels that he needs to look down on the ordinary users with a high attitude, and they may think they have everything with technology. Probably, I think so.

I can't understand technical apes as much as I hate technical apes.

When we use the data to speak, the technical ape thinks we are sophistry. The desktop market has long dominated the win, and long-term possession of 1%, down to the point of poor Linux. I think, this is very boring excuses it.

I am not against technology, today's life is inseparable from technology. But I always insist that there is demand in the presence of people, and technology cannot change demand, but demand can create technology.

Whether it's apple, Microsoft, or Facebook, their success is built on the needs of their customers, and don't say what Mr. Jobs created has changed people's needs. Full screen mobile phone is not the first Apple to invent, tablet computer Microsoft has long been out, who still remember Windows Table? Mr. Jobs did not change the habits of others ' needs, but instead improved and marketed them according to the needs and habits of others.

He is a businessman, this is the world knows, not technology, is sales!

Change the topic back, and continue to say why I hate technical apes.

At home, a lot of technical apes have been misunderstood users, foreign also have, but the domestic is really very much, no wonder many people call the programmer "ape".

Take the present, Silent Street using a template although more beautiful, but many problems. For example, the home page thumbnail is a picture that references the original image rather than actually reducing the resolution. The consequence of this is that the page is too large, affect the user browsing experience, and indirectly affect the SEO (Search engine optimization). In addition, the template background operation, JS files affect some of the functions of WordPress itself.

Because I used the template can be automatically referenced to reduce the resolution of the picture. To this end, I contacted the developer of the current template, presented my suggestions to him, and told him that such improvements can improve the customer experience and SEO optimization. As a result, I stepped on the mine.

The developer was grumpy and replied, "You can manually enter the thumbnail address at the post reference." What is to help customers do, but also technology to do?

Well, I might have a disagreement with the way the ape developed the product.

One possibility: If you want to keep the problem to the customer two times to pay for your development, I have no opinion, I need your template can pay you, but did not hear you have this business;

The second possibility, you think customers also need to understand those complex technology, and do some of the original technical level to solve the problem, do not always trouble the technical ape?

God, if that's the case, who's paying for your template ... Everyone is a technical ape, how do you survive?

Do you want every customer to do some extra work each time they publish content?

Again, SEO problem, you said I do not understand SEO ... Your template is only 69 points in Google's test score, I do not know how you see this, or you can completely ignore your own short board, ignoring the customer experience.

Well, you won.

This is not the first time that I have encountered such a technical ape, the customer experience in their view is second, they look like cattle is the real cow. Can I say that?

Citing Windows and Linux: The argument that Linux has been hit by win is a myth, but it boils down to the fact that Linux doesn't understand the customer experience at all.

Not everyone likes to use orders, which is something most people hate.

Most users do not know how to operate the computer, they do not need too much function, just need them to quickly start, help work

Like a fool's camera, it makes it easy for many people to keep their memories, without the need for superior photography and professional photography. Know how to press the shutter, you can save the wonderful Life. Without a fool's camera, we'd lose a lot of color now.

Jobs knows this, and he doesn't give users too much of a choice, like a stupid machine with less professional but annoying buttons.

So the iphone won, not to mention Android's share, don't forget the iphone's model is only 5 now, and Android models are countless. The war with a handful of victorious majorities is simply because he understands the needs of users, and the iphone gives them a good experience.

Windows, too, Windows is a bit more troublesome than Mac and has a command mode similar to Linux, but users can do anything they want without using any command. Full graphics interface, double-click, click, enter, almost all of the operations need only these several items can be completed, convenient?

Windows and Linux have been nominally playing for years, and Linux has been easily compared to Mac. Third-party or expensive to die, must match their own expensive hardware sales of a system.

Because Windows and Macs understand the needs of their customers, they give them a perfect and not redundant experience.

Instead of technology the ape thinks the cow is the real cow, and the command can do all the work, said a technician at a developer forum. You look like a cow, but the client is miserable.

We don't need cows, we don't need superb technology. I can pay for the imac, the Macbook Air, the Windows computer, the Adobe Suite, all the software and computers I need. Also do not use that kind of so-called free Linux, the reason and I hate the technology ape, too much toss.

What we need is a stable, simple, and can meet our daily Office system and software platform, so we can complete our own work, to create the greatest benefits.

According to the technical ape's thinking, we need to learn to command, learn the underlying technology of the system, create our own development environment, and finally deliver the work before we do our job.

If so, it's really over. Busy jobs won't give us so much time to toss these things out of our field. That's what your tech ape should be responsible for. If these are not given, then it is not a qualified technician, at most just an irresponsible and do not understand the responsibility of the technical ape.

Every job has its own responsibilities, just like technicians do the technology, and financial analysts do finance generally (it feels like nonsense). The technician has its own advantages, but can not force his users to achieve their own standards, which is unrealistic.

Each professional division of labor is different, good at certainly different. Do not impose your own thoughts on others, a good technician is a person who can understand the needs of customers and make reasonable solutions. On the contrary, technical apes may only write cheap code for the rest of their lives, complaining and doing the least promising thing.