"Think" what are the mainstream users in China?

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

Recently, the mind is always turning some web2.0 and netizens love things, some ideas written here as a record of it.

First of all, a puzzled me a long time a problem, such as foreign, a lot of things abroad are all people when the base, very few people do deliberate classification, if there is a classification that is made after the things. Take a plane analogy, first invented the aircraft did not think of these things need to use, the aircraft developed to now, the civilian words in foreign countries can basically reach the extent of the plane, the plane in those foreigners impression is just a means of transport, In the past few years, some people in the country always like to say something about flying things on the mouth, as if flying is a symbol of identity. Of course, this has been a lot better these years. This situation is more or less some of the reasons for the income, but if the aircraft in the domestic invention, the aircraft may be like a sedan chair as a special tool, the ordinary people even if the money can not sit some type of sedan chair, such as eight lift six of the sedan chair. Of course, this may be just a conjecture.

The above thing is mainly about a kind of thinking difference. Put on the site of the person to speak is to do the subconscious classification of the site. Of course, the above thing can also be put in the attitude of people on the car.

Like what Douban.com This site, some time ago to see an ID in the TechWeb Forum on the analysis of the characteristics of Beijing Shanghai Guangzhou Three sites, very interesting, he will be in Shanghai Douban.com said as a little petty bourgeoisie, like the city of Shanghai, naturally limited this site can not develop, I think is very reasonable, because from the douban.com Alexa graph looks like is in a relatively mature stage. The author of the post attributed this to a geographical reason, and although I felt a little bit certain, I always felt that there was a sense of God in Benjamin.

The argument from that post is that douban.com is facing a small group of petty bourgeoisie.

And Douban.com is indeed the representative of the Chinese web2.0 website, even including Keso and some of the famous Internet commentators have been praised for this form of Web site.

Now many web2.0 sites have not formed a certain scale, the problem in their face to the user there? They face a wrong user? for example, should douban.com not be oriented towards petty bourgeoisie? Well, then analyze the other representative of the web2.0 website and do a reverse comparison. is www.di3fang.cn www.di3fang.cn in my industry friend mouth is to its analogy into a 1781.html "> grassroots website, take not onstage, is called to seize the first-tier city users after the promotion is easy, seize the two or three-line city users after the promotion is difficult, The development of 51.com will certainly encounter some problems (not my opinion). Friends concluded that, on the www.di3fang.cn people basically can not be counted into a group of high-quality, with a relatively simple words is the www.di3fang.cn people are ready to go to find mobile data. But the problem is, is it the root of the cell phone information? From the comments of friends in the industry to see a feeling that douban.com and www.di3fang.cn is not a level. Two sites will look at the overall perception of their users and websites as if they are different, but just from the point of view of a one-night stand, it seems to have found a relationship between two sites that seem to be 108,000 of the content gap.

Two sites are web2.0 sites that can represent one area, and are very successful in their respective areas of the site, but from the analysis just now, two stations if one can be another site to face the user community attracted to believe that there will be better and more powerful development. How to do it? That's the problem with how the product is designed.

Topic back to the topic, China's mainstream users. I think that there should be no great need to discuss this topic, because no matter from the first-tier city users or with a N-class small county users can find common needs, who can meet more people's needs of the site can be more successful. Try to avoid their own brain deliberately to classify users, as far as possible to meet the needs of users is a good product design staff should have the ability.