Two traders sell fake millet mobile phone sued court to compensate 14000 yuan

Legal Evening News (reporter Hongche) this morning Fengtai court informed that the Millet Science and Technology Co., Ltd. (hereinafter referred to as Millet company) The first prosecution of counterfeit Millet mobile phone sellers trademark infringement cases to make a first instance judgment, Two individual households were sentenced to cease infringement and compensation for millet company economic losses and reasonable expenses amounted to more than 14,000 yuan. Millet company sued, Millet is the No. 8911270 trademark of the registered trademark of the exclusive right of people, but found in a market leasing stalls operating communications equipment, Mr. Shaw, Mr. Lee sales of mobile phones on the use of "Mi" and other signs, infringement of the exclusive rights of their registered trademarks, the market as the management has not fulfilled the management responsibilities, constitute a joint infringement, The Court is required to decree the defendant to cease infringement, eliminate the impact and compensate for the economic loss of 50,000 yuan. Market-related officials said that Mr. Shaw, Mr. Lee rented stalls not owned by the market, the market only rented a whole hall to operate, other places by a Beijing company operating, and therefore do not agree with the plaintiff's lawsuit request. And Mr. Shaw, Mr. Lee said, the millet company's notarial procedure is not lawful, in the process of notarization did not wear uniforms, did not show a certificate, and the time of Notarization and notarial book issued by the time interval too long. In addition, millet company required 50,000 yuan compensation amount is too high. Court hearing that the use of the phone in connection with the logo and the No. 8911270 trademark visual effects no significant difference, is an approximate trademark, the case of the mobile phone is infringing goods. Mr. Shaw, Mr. Li, as the operator of communications equipment, should be aware of the trademarks of Millet companies involved, and it is clearly marked on the receipt of its sales is "millet" mobile phone. The court held that the millet company requires the defendant to eliminate the influence, the market undertakes the joint tort liability basis insufficiency. Finally, the court sentenced Mr. Shaw and Mr. Li to stop infringement and compensation for the economic loss and reasonable expenditure of millet company more than 14,000 yuan.