Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall
Preface: Inadvertently in See ADMIN5 more than a few horizontal look net article, when it comes to how many news reports and stuff like that. Go inside and have a look. I would like to talk about my own opinion. I usually do not often on ADMIN5, but also rarely write articles, but I have to write today. I have listed the following points
First, the website design, the technical level is too bad.
If I hadn't read the news first, I thought it was a personal homepage. From the layout, picture material, color collocation aspect, too rough.
Second, the operating model is not clear
Ad-Valorem advertising is more like a concept, let me feel is not novel and practical, I personally guess that the advertisers are now advertising is entirely a fancy to the news and several other sites reported. Rather than your advertising model and site value.
Three, look more like three minutes of enthusiastic "innovation"
Cross-viewing is just refreshing, but not practical. Although webmasters call it subversive, in fact you can't change the tradition. Once the user's freshness is over, everything is empty talk.
Iv. Channels and content
Opened a few channels is really inconspicuous, and the site is too far apart, since it is an innovative site, content should be innovative, rather than blindly in the "promotion of their own", copying others. The content is very few pitiful, gives the person's first sense is, hastily, the website is not prepared to announce outward. Plus those copied over, more reminiscent of the "garbage station" three words.
Five, webmaster more like in the hype, for show
This is only the webmaster to my first feeling, from his words, CEO, VCs, etc. are unrealistic. Even their own site is not good, talking about what to do to others to do the site, minds this brand site, it is not possible, not to mention your team is a kind of team, I believe you know more clearly here to the spectators to think about. Inconvenience to say more.
Vi. Future and development
Look at this pattern of fresh-keeping period is not long, the development line is not clear, in the final analysis, everyone is talking about this model, rather than talking about the pros and cons of the site. Look at the net give me a personal feeling is that the mode of operation and innovation of the horizontal look too far, the site does not exist some of the actual content, about the content, I think users will still go to those portal network.
Vii. Overall evaluation
To be honest, I'm not optimistic about this site with the webmaster. It's more like a hype about attracting media and public attention than trying to seriously think about how subversion can be transformed into a tradition, though that's unlikely. I believe the discerning can see it.
Writing here, I have omitted a lot of content, inconvenient to write down, I think my evaluation is pertinent. The intention is fresh. These are my personal opinions, there is no language attacks and other things. Welcome to reply to the discussion.