who defines "exposing privacy"?

Absrtact: Google, which is struggling to put out fire around the world, is now in the business of even its own firefighters. News from Italy, after more than 3 years of trial, the Italian court of Milan on February 24, sentenced to Google senior vice president and chief Law

Google, which is struggling to "put out fire" around the world, is now in the business of even its own firefighters.

News from Italy, after more than 3 years of trial, the Italian Court of Milan ruled on February 24, sentenced to Google senior vice president and chief legal Officer David Drummond, former Google chief financial officer George Reyes and Google Global privacy advisor Peter Fletcher Three 6 months of prison sentences, suspended execution. The offence is a violation of personal privacy.

On the verdict, a Google spokeswoman, Bill, said Google would appeal vigorously because the three executives were not at fault. "We will certainly appeal, because we think it is a serious test of the fundamental freedom of the Internet," says Bill. Google's three employees were not related to the video, they did not upload video, did not shoot video, did not browse the video, but was sentenced to guilt. If this offence is established, we believe that this will pose a threat to the freedom that the Internet brings. ”

Trouble users upload Video

Bill's video, referring to the 3 years ago in early September 2006, was uploaded to Google's Italian website for a 3-minute mobile video. In the video, four male students at a technical school in Turin beat and humiliated a classmate with Down syndrome on campus. Video from September 8, 2006 to November 7 in the Google search engine spread for 2 months, causing outrage in Italy. The Italian Down Syndrome Patient Rights Protection Agency Vivi down so that 4 of Google executives were sued in court. After investigation, the Italian inspection authorities filed a criminal lawsuit against the chief executives of Google's Italian company.

Although Google's Italian division eventually deleted the video and helped police bring 4 suspects to justice, prosecutors believe Google reacted too slowly after receiving complaints about the video. In fact, the incident occurred before the Google acquisition of YouTube in 2006, so Google's defense attorneys at the hearing has been said that Google's behavior is "completely legal." But the focus of the case, according to the prosecution's documents, is not freedom of the internet, but some of the business practices used by Google that undermine the basic rights of citizens, including privacy.

Google will do its best to "overturn"

For such a case, not only was it a matter of concern, the company's response was naturally strong, expressing "shock" and raising the verdict to a high level, calling it a "threat to internet freedom" because it imposed on Internet service providers the impossible tasks, That is, pre-screening internet users on a daily basis to upload a website like YouTube thousands of-hour video. But prosecutors insist that this case has nothing to do with internet freedom, but about how to enjoy freedom while not infringing on the interests of others. After the video has become the most viewed video, Google should draw attention.

In fact, Google has repeatedly expressed its innocence. Google said in July 2008 that it had fully cooperated with the Italian prosecutors ' investigation, and that the findings found that Google executives had nothing to do with bullying students ' video events. In addition, a Google spokeswoman has said that the Italian prosecutors to let Google executives stand trial, will open a "disturbing precedent." The spokesman also said that Google is only an Internet service provider, the same year after receiving a video of bullying students to remove it in time, indicating that Google has done its job, so the Italian prosecutors should not prosecute Google's corresponding executives.

For this verdict, Google will certainly appeal, if it can not be reversed, it would largely mean to strangle the search engine's neck. Under current EU rules, Google does not need to censor third-party content, and EU regulations are embodied in Italian law, but this is similar to the problems Google has encountered in China and many other countries and regions, that is, should it comply with local laws and regulations?

Compared to Google's Italian executives, Google China's President Lee Kai-fu is lucky many, it should be said that Google's "pornographic door" on the social harm is much greater than in the Italian video, although the previous scholars have asked whether Google China's senior officials to sentence, but ultimately nothing.

who defines "exposing privacy"?

Judging by the Italian prosecutors ' case against Google officials, "exposing privacy" will likely be a common crime for search engines in the future. Sources say that Google has worked with the U.S. National Security Agency (FBI), which means the famous U.S. intelligence agency will share the vast amount of information gathered by Google from around the world.

Founded in 1998, Google is currently the world's largest Internet search engine company, with offices in more than 30 countries and regions. Its data centers are now global, with millions of servers processing 10多亿次 user search requests every day. The National Security Agency, founded in 1952, is an important agency in the U.S. government's intelligence network. During the Cold War, the U.S. National Security Agency, allied with Western Union Telegraph, stole millions of telegrams. After the 911 incident, the NSA was free to eavesdrop on private phones and steal private e-mails.

Google's search records, IP addresses, and usage preferences for all Internet users are analyzed in archives. Google's Internet search market share of about 70%, master so many user data, how to ensure the user's personal information security? Who should disclose to whom and who is entitled to be informed? None of these questions are conclusive.

This shows that the search engine has mastered a large number of Internet users on the path of privacy, if the Google did not in Italy, then the future for Google and even all search engines, "invasion of privacy" may become a common charge of prosecution.