Who has the right to determine the "blacklist"?

Intermediary transaction http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/6858.html ">seo diagnose Taobao guest cloud host technology Hall

According to the media recently reported that Google search on the internet "China porcelain Jingdezhen", pop-up Jingdezhen official website of the People's government has been Google found that "the site may contain malicious software, there may be harmful to your computer." It is understood that the site is owned by the Jingdezhen People's government office, has been in Jiangxi Province Communications authority for the record.

Why are the local government websites that have been filed with malicious labels on Google's blacklist?

In fact, "China porcelain Jingdezhen" is not the only "special treatment" site. Data show that "Fujian Red Cross", "Fujian Netcom", "Fujian province broadcast film and television group", "Fujian Sports Lottery Network", "Jiayuguan People's government website" have encountered similar problems.

Why is that? It is understood that the "blacklist" system is the world's largest search engine Google's "conventional weapons", that is, some of its "unruly" site to implement a special policy to facilitate the search results more in line with Google's rules, generally have the following two kinds of situations:

In the search results completely remove the entire site or part of the site's pages. This is generally because the site used the means of cheating to improve their search ranking, the typical case has "German Volkswagen" and so on.

Second, when Google detected that the site was placed malicious code will infringe on the browser's computer security, it will be in search results of the page link below prompts "the site may contain malicious software, there may be harm to your computer." Jingdezhen Web site is the second case.

This tip for search users, can play a very good warning role. But from another perspective, for the site that has been identified with malicious code, its negative role can not be ignored: Most sites rely on search engines to make traffic today (many sites from the search engine has been more than 70% of the traffic rate), the site if erected "Inside there are bad Wolf, the girl cautiously into" the sign, The site is likely to face extinction.

Does Google have the right to do this? "a netizen said," The government site has not been updated for several months, the site was people hanging ' horse ' (refers to being hacked by the Trojan and other bad procedures), do not know, really ridiculous, still here shouting loudly, " But it cannot be inferred that Google has the right to touch the commercial interests of legitimate websites in the name of protecting Internet users ' security.

The word "blacklist" originates from prestigious universities such as Oxford and Cambridge, England. As early as in the Middle Ages, the schools stipulated that the names and behavior of the students committing misconduct would be recorded in the Black Book. The method was then used by British businessmen to punish customers who were often discredited, who did not keep the contract, and who did not trust them.

This shows that "blacklist" if only used for QQ and mobile phones, used to filter rubbish information, but is a practical tool to affect the surface is very small, and in the commercial field, it has become a kind of heavy weapons with a blocking nature, not to have been, use is not dead or injured, should be cautious.