Who is the CMS fighter? N CMS Content Model evaluation

2007 CMS system has been a relatively large change, the previous built-in channel concept has been basically eliminated, content model this freedom of greater things to stand up and rob the public's sight. Since it is a custom model, its custom, the degree of freedom should be very large, then with interest, I simply to the current domestic comparison of several major CMS system content model function evaluation.

The evaluation of the choice of dynamic SiteFactory1.0, dedecms5.1, the Empire 4.7 version, from the built-in model, add models, add a field of three aspects.

Built-in models

&http://www.aliyun.com/zixun/aggregation/37954.html ">nbsp;

Dynamic Sitefactory Built-in model

DEDECMS Built-in model

Empire built model

Number: From the screenshot can be seen, these CMS systems are built more commonly used built-in models, such as articles, pictures, downloads and so on, alone in terms of the number of imperial systems have advantages.

Functions: Basic skills include deletion, add, modify, copy and other functions, content model information display is very comprehensive. But because the Sitefactory nodes can support multiple models, they are more full-featured in the replication of the models, and the Dedecms and Empire columns can only support a content model.

UI aspect: This is easy and dedecms do very good, from the interface and graphics aspects of the effort, but dedecms use more graphics instead of text, use more direct and friendly. I think the imperial system has to do more with the interface.

Model additions

Dynamic Sitefactory Model Add interface

DEDECMS Model Add interface

Empire CMS Model Add interface

Interface: From the point of view of the addition of the interface, the imperial system model added is the most pinch, only in the built-in model based on the model to add, and the model of the variable settings are too simple. Dynamic and Dede is very straightforward, directly click the Add Model button can be added to the model.