Why do you like to copy foreign innovative products?

At present, from the many so-called innovative products in China, although it is playing the slogan of micro-innovation, but in fact, some of the UI to modify the interface, the language from English to Chinese, some do not conform to the use of Chinese netizens to remove the habit, these are basically the most respected micro-innovation, At least it is the micro-innovation method that everybody is practicing at present;

Of course, there are many cases, I do not want to call the roll, we can see, since we all admit that this is a micro-innovation, well, I will have to default on such a micro-innovative methodology;

Now is the Internet and mobile Internet rapid development of the era of innovation, the Silicon Valley there are new, interesting, promising internet, mobile internet and other innovative products, you can use the word to describe its many, such as social questions and answers class quora,formspring; For example, the path,instagram,color of photography, such as reading Flipboard,zaker, and so on, these are well-known, but also the media often reported, but everyone in the plagiarism, then, why do you want to copy these freshly released products? Another question. What is the basis of these products? Why not copy other products? Is there a future for plagiarism?

In fact, there is no future, the original copyright people do not know, not to mention the copy of the people, why they want to copy the works of those who are copyright, based on the following aspects (personally think):

1, this is an absolute innovation, products that meet the needs of users; Quora, for example, is a relatively innovative product in a social quiz product that has not been seen in the country before (of course, you've seen the question-and-answer product, "Baidu Knows"), and Quora's practice proves that the social networking era, Netizens do need such a question and answer product, more focused, deeper, more accurate;

2, this product has been the user's recognition and consensus; For example, Instagram this photo software, the line does not have a long time to obtain millions of users, this is an indirect explanation of this product is a netizen needs in the mobile internet era of social photography applications;

3, while disorderly earn a silver; so the so-called "innovation" developers are not a few, now is the era of hot money rolling, entrepreneurial team blind to create projects, and the purpose of creating projects is to get the attention of VC, and then take the money, so OK;

But take the money also have to have a reason, the former concept hype that trick again use up, casually take out a foreign not proven or proven innovative products to cheat VC How how money, of course, VC is not stupid, do VC, all are elves, but in the current era of hot money rolling, they also inevitably dizziness brain bulge, otherwise, How can there be a case of investment failure, you say that foreign innovation projects they basically know, but they may fancy the team doing this, you have a successful case before or insiders know how you are, someone else to inquire about, OK, good words, money will give you, so that you cheat money to achieve the purpose;

So, you're not going to get paid for that? Dry, of course, VC see the team according to the general principle of absolute, project will be out of the oven, take money, the natural, the product will certainly give you see, but as the result is not successful failure, it is necessary to see this person, after all, some people are aimed at taking investment, project on line, The result regardless, or not to mind, dead died, anyway, the money, such a lot of things, also do not make a fuss, some people for work, some people for money, very normal;

Above is purely a fantasy, if there is a similarity, purely fate;

Plagiarism this matter, or plagiarism is the best, do not have a whole care of a fancy product out of blind wound, so many products, you can not copy the point, who use you?