Why does the shooter net want to close

1. Living in Chinese society for so many years, the minimum of Oriental wisdom must have, some things are not linear interpretation. This time can be explained by copyright, then the video site to buy the copyright of the show is forced to the shelves and how to explain it? This is a very promising development and there is no copyright problem of a model AH. And I believe that most of the students will be stable to watch the overseas play is also a middle class in this country, they may not be a thin sense of copyright, more may not be willing to pay to watch the play, but the other side of the gambling is not sparse but more rigorous gambling, want to respect copyright and no chance.

2. Say specific cases. Copyright This is actually not very reliable, everyone film and television do swim in the gray area, but the archer Net is a subtitle translation of the author of the free share subtitles model, it is really difficult to put the copyright of the pot buckle on their heads. Webmaster I think now is also very wronged, think about later translation of subtitles or also become illegal activities, there is really a thrill of excitement. It turns out that when the interpreter of law and the executor are not separated, "rule of law" is a line that needs vigilance.

3. The essence of the incident is a heightened wall, no doubt. The new totalitarianism, which has been brewing for nearly a decade, has finally come to fruition, making it an unusual sigh for a decade of hard work for the upper. Personally, I would rather stay in an authoritarian society full of refined self-interest than to live in a beautiful but false Truman Show, and not allow my offspring to be in this situation-I think it is human nature to decide.

4. The power of restraint is there, but not optimistic. You may recall that a few years ago, when Weibo was at its peak, the exchange of views was dazzling, and I was also optimistic that the Internet was a powerful tool for the nurturing of civil society in a modest improvement. It turned out that the consideration was still a bit defective, and the problem was that the developed technology not only facilitated the people but also facilitated the rulers and even more efficiently. The wall may not be very high, but the problem is that the walls are not meant for those who are aware of it. Pull the big divide this thing to do good, as to scattered out the next movie, temporarily still can't control you, also don't need to tube. The Chinese are so many, heightening an inch wall can play down how many people, think still very terrible.

5. Pull the big gap this is to be done sooner or later, when the sound of the big rich people through efforts, they eat meat, we have a cup of soup can be. But now the cake can be divided more and more small, want to keep a vested interest in the class cake, not good information control is impossible. On the one hand, it is a sad paradox to say that the wisdom of the Open is blocked by the channel of Wisdom. Even more paradoxical is that the far-right temples on the surface of flattery is still a set of Marx, if we all take a serious look at the original code of horse, wait until the economic dividend period after the smooth, what will happen I am unimaginable. Of course, the superior is not so silly, to reduce the college entrance examination of English scores of these things, not also do it.

6. Digression, think of an interesting thing, a few years ago I was in the tiger flutter, pedestrian street or where there is a tout Chinese army posts, basically they said into the Chi years of the most powerful army, see God kill God See Buddha Kill Buddha. I was young, and heard some things, so Bufen said a strong is strong, but the problem of corruption to be resolved ah. It was a sour, I was directly chased several pages, onlookers are more cynical. Until now the high house in the check out of the cash to tons, I recall this matter, and then think of those who can not say the granted of the rumors of the students, not by Senser. I deeply feel that they are not unaware of the importance of information in the information age, but they understand it from their own perspective.