You can't die without dying. How to test the lover's bottom line efficiently?

"True love is a test."

Compared to the "Santa Claus in the world", we usually have to go to high school and university to know that this is a deceptive words ...

Everyone envy the high school class couples, after the University of one side went to the far city to study, contact dwindling, and finally one day received a newsletter, which only said "Hope is still a friend" these words.

A careful check, you found that he had a new love, still continue to write full text messages, but not to your mobile phone.

In a sample space filled with tears and blood from friends and relatives, we may have to revise the words of true love to the test:

"The degree of love is proportional to the rigor of the test." The more profound the lovers, the more they can withstand the challenge of the powerful third party. ”

"Know each other, win, not knowing the other and confidant, a win and a negative, do not know the other, not confidant, every battle will be perilous." "--Sun Tzu's Art of War and attack third"

This sentence is not only applicable in the battlefield and shopping malls, but also in love. If you don't know yourself and your lover, your feelings will never last, only half the chance you will be able to maintain. In order to have a long-term relationship, you must seriously understand the other half of the bottom line, to confirm the relationship between the two, on the one hand can be the greatest degree to do their own.

But to understand the other side of the bottom line is not to be asked to know, this kind of thing to say, like in the male school to investigate the number of girlfriends, everyone will say too full.

Perhaps she said: "I am open-minded, just don't let me open the door, see you and a woman lying in bed." ”

"In fact, even if lying in bed, as long as wearing clothes, it doesn't matter." ”

But in the next second, when you pay a smile to the salesgirl, she immediately scolds you that even the clerk dares to flirt with the real nasty.

The bottom line is like a dog's poop on the road, only to know when you step on it.

What we are going to discuss today is "how to effectively test the bottom line of each other."

Let's say the other half tells you "what he can't Stand" is set at 100.

All we have to do is find out how much x,x he can't actually tolerate.

When your partner treats you like a beauty and asks you not to, then the only thing you can do is to go from the least serious mistake:

The phone rang a few more to connect (1 points);

After she finished her jokes, she smiled for a few seconds (2 points);

She does not laugh after telling jokes (3 points);

After she finished the joke, she told her not to laugh (4 points);

Gradually increase the severity, until she faces, you immediately apologize, in the heart to draw her bottom line.

If she can't stand the severity of 99 points, you have to do 99 tests, quite troublesome.

If she's more forgiving and allows you to make mistakes two times, you can quickly touch the bottom line if you're good at math.

Most people intuitively choose to do a 50-point thing first, like seeing a movie with another girl.

If she's not angry, do 75 more things and go on a night trip with another girl.

If she gets angry at the movie, it means she can tolerate it between 1 and 50 points.

Because there is only one chance, and then have to go back to the phone rang a few more before the start of the 1 point, slowly test. It takes 49+1 so many times to know where her bottom line is.

This intuitive approach can reduce the number of tests by less than half.

Another way to do this is to divide all 100 open square root into 10 paragraphs first:

In front of her to eat salt crispy chicken and burning fairy grass and said "because you said you want to lose weight so I didn't buy you" (10 points).

If she laughs all right, do it again:

The date was 15 minutes late, and when I saw her she waved slowly (20 points).

If she's angry, go back to 11 and figure out when she'll be upset between 11 and 19.

In this case, when her bottom line is 99 o'clock, it will take the most effort to test, it is 10+9=19 time to know her bottom line. is about 2.5 times times more than the previous method.

But not the most provincial.

Because in this case, when the bottom line falls at more than 10, you can quickly measure it, but when the bottom line is more than 90, it takes a lot of time to measure it. Obviously, it would be a better way to increase the measurement spacing at the beginning than each of the 10 segments.

Assuming that it takes up to X times, the first Test starts directly from the X point. There is something wrong, try again from the beginning, this will spend 1+ x-1=x number of times. If nothing happens, start the test next time (2x-1). In the case of an accident, you only need to go from (throttled) to (2x-2) to take a slow test, the maximum will be X-2 times, plus the previous 2 tests, Total or X times.

In other words, we're going to use a progression with a tolerance of 1.

The progression and Formula X (throttled)/2 must be greater than or equal to 100, and the minimum value of x can be 14.

In other words, compared to 10 paragraphs, each 10 points, the better way is to divide into 14 paragraphs, each paragraph is 14, 13, 12 ... Reduced accordingly.

You tell her that I'm not free to pick you up tonight (14 points).

If she's okay, next time, show her that you don't want to go to her sister's party (14+13=27 point).

Again it's a matter of severity 27+12=39, and so on. In this way, the test time you spend most is 14, 1.36 times times faster than the previous 19.

After reading this article, now, are you ready to know the enemy and annoy your partner?