Zhejiang Longsheng Notice many false letter put exposure big problem

After a thorough investigation of the daily economic news reporter, Zhejiang Long exposed more problems, research and development of the world's most expensive rubber announcements in a number of factors untrue, not only made the wrong agreement partners, and the technology is not unique to the United States and Germany, the domestic Yanshan petrochemical as early as 7 months ago has been built production equipment; more importantly,　　The technical breakthrough of the effectiveness of identification has yet to be verified, "trial production of the main technical indicators and imports of similar products of the same quality"-this test is only the conclusion of Zhejiang Longsheng project team.　　At the beginning of March 2011, "Daily Economic News" continuously published the "Zhejiang Long wear lag suspected violation of the most expensive rubber test progress into Mystery", "Zhejiang Liuzhou sheng Good Bulletin is not true professor Zhe denied participation" and other reports.　　March 11, Zhejiang Us (600352, closing price of 11.72 Yuan) issued a notice, recognized the joint development and investment agreement was signed by Chen Su rather than Chen Ganqi, and apologized to investors, but to the letter on the lag problem to take evasive attitude, no mention. After the daily economic news reporter again in-depth investigation found that Zhejiang Longsheng the most expensive rubber bulletin of the core content is untrue.　　But it is such a flawed "false good", but led to two consecutive trading price, followed by a slump in the trend. There are already production devices in China Zhejiang US said in a November 30, 2010 Announcement: "Brominated butyl rubber is so far manufactured without inner tire and pharmaceutical products irreplaceable raw materials, the current technology has declared two invention patents, the international only the United States, Germany has this production technology and equipment.　　"Prior to November 26, the company held a press conference, the local media also to" foreign monopoly of the 66 world's most expensive rubber technology was finally breached by Zhejiang Province "as the title of the event for a large section of the report. In fact, this is untrue. China Petrochemical (8.62,0.03,0.35%) Yanshan branch in 2007 issued a plan to build an annual output of 30,000 tons of brominated butyl rubber production equipment, to April 2010 completed and put into production. Since then, the official web site, including the Beijing Sasac, quoted May 11, 2010 as saying: "Sinopec Beijing Yanshan Petrochemical Company 30,000 tons/year brominated butyl rubber device is the only one set of bromine butyl equipment, the installation of the use of China petrochemical independent development technology, with complete independent intellectual property rights, Fill the gaps in relevant areas of the country. January 31, 2011, the NDRC also published on its website, "2010 Synthetic rubber Industry Run again" article, the Sinopec Yanshan branch of the plant gave a high evaluation, "April 2010, Sinopec Yanshan Branch 30,000 tons of brominated butyl rubber production equipment, Maoming Luhua Chemical 15,000 tons of isoprene rubber production plant has been completed and put into production, filling the domestic bromine butyl rubber and isoprene rubber production gap.　　On the contrary, the article does not mention the Zhejiang Dragon Sheng. Sinopec Yanshan Branch of the production of brominated butyl rubber in the time than the release of Zhejiang LongshengThe time is more than six months early, not Zhejiang us not know, so that "only the United States, Germany has this (brominated butyl rubber) production technology and equipment" words? In this respect, Zhejiang Longsheng Securities representative Chen initially questioned Sinopec Yanshan Branch technology, and when the daily economic news reporter said: "You can be responsible for what you said."　　Chen immediately silent. The conclusion of the appraisal is to speak from the words in addition, Zhejiang us in the pilot announcement that the holding subsidiaries Longshan chemical, Zhejiang into equal, Chen Ganqi established brominated butyl Rubber Pilot Group of industrial bromine butyl rubber production technology breakthrough, by the Beijing Institute of Rubber Industry, physical and chemical testing laboratory testing laboratories,　　The main technical indexes of trial production are equal to the quality of imported similar products. The test samples were tested by a third party, which seemed to be impartial and authoritative.　　However, when the daily economic news reporter contacted the Beijing Rubber Industry Institute of Physical and Chemical testing laboratories, staff Wang Jing (sound) gave the answer is different from the announcement, the other side denied having made the appraisal conclusion.　　NBD: zhejiang US sent a sample of brominated butyl rubber for you to test?　　Wang Jing: yes.　　NBD: Did they send the samples by themselves?　　Wang Jing: Yes!　　NBD: How to guarantee the authenticity of samples? Wang Jing: this ...　　Send samples to do the experiment, he is the client, for what is the sample, we are only responsible for (testing) data.　　NBD: Did you just do the data, or do the evaluation, or both?　　Wang Jing: He has only done some raw materials in our experiment, after the data is gone, perhaps they also have a research and development team.　　NBD: Do they judge for themselves?　　Wang Jing: yes.　　NBD: "The main technical indicators and imports of similar products of equal quality" evaluation is that they have to come out, not you?　　Wang Jing: yes.　　NBD: That is to say that you only give them data, and do not do evaluation services, you can do evaluation, but they did not entrust you to do?　　Wang Jing: yes, it is. Trial production Sample "the main technical indicators and imports of similar products of comparable quality" evaluation is not from Beijing Rubber Industry Institute of Physical and Chemical testing laboratories, which should be from? "Daily economic news" reporter on this matter asked Zhejiang Longsheng Securities Representative Chen, Chen finally gave the answer: "This is their team to judge their own."　　"Regardless of the authenticity of the samples, the pilot group to evaluate their own products, it is very surprising." A lot of false announcements. If it is a major technological breakthrough at the forefront of the world, how to identify it?　　In this respect, "Daily economic news" reporter interviewed the domestic rubber field of well-known experts. Special rubber, Sichuan University, College of Polymer materials science and engineering professor Yellow Light speed to reporters: "Major projects to obtain technical breakthroughs, should be organized in the industry experts to identify, but also to the provincial or national level." Since samples are sent to authority for testing, evaluation should be done by the testing agency, it is not possible to make your own evaluation. "At this point, Zhejiang us November 30, 2010 issued the announcement has been in the agreement of the Signatories, identification results and technical breakthroughs in the sense of misrepresentation, signed the Joint Development and investment agreement is Chen Su rather than Chen Ganqi; sample Evaluation" The main technical indicators and the quality of imported similar products "is their own judgment, Domestic production technology and equipment, Zhejiang us is not exclusive. If you add a press conference before, after the announcement of the letter in the lag, the company has been suspected of violating the Securities Act 63rd, 67th provisions: "The issuer, listed companies in accordance with the law disclosure of information, must be true, accurate and complete, no false records, misleading statements or major omissions", " A major event that may have a greater impact on the price of a listed company's stock Exchange, when the investor has not been informed, the listed company shall immediately submit an interim report to the Securities regulatory agency of the State Council and the stock exchange on the circumstances of the event, and give notice of the cause, current state and possible legal consequences of the incident. However, when the daily economic news reporter again to zhejiang US asked about the relevant questions, Chen, Chen Su, Chen Ganqi refused to respond.