Zhou, Fu oral history PK: Who is more trustworthy?

Recently, security is not peaceful, around the 360 chairman Zhou and the "father of 360", Cash Mountain network CEO Fu "personal grievances" is the most interesting. Weibo on the emergence of "rumors and saliva Qi, the Navy's color" of the spectacle, its intensity is second only to the 3Q war (I call it "small 3Q War").

Around this event, the longest, the most detailed description, the most widely disseminated, can refer to the most valuable two articles, is precisely oral history. Respectively by Caixin Network columnist Cheng, 360 first floor architect Chian compose, the original link is as follows:

Cheng: "Fu oral History: I am not Lin Biao"

Http://opinion.caixin.cn/2011-10-12/100313405.html

Chian: "Fu resignation: from 360 to Tencent Pawn"

Http://blog.sina.com.cn/s/blog_92a146440100utcf.html?tj=1

Lee's article as a "job title", of course, represents the 360 side of the argument; Although the identity of Cheng is a third party, but considering the strategic alliance between Tencent and Jinshan, this article can be considered Jinshan side of the argument. Although Cheng a lot of industry boss (including more than 8 million fans of Kai-fu Lee) spread more widely, but as the saying goes "reasonable no longer sound high", for gossip enthusiasts, onlookers control, these two articles is the best research clues.

The following author to the literal and logical respectively for everyone to appreciate the two article Chiven. (This article is longer, in order for us to see more clearly, the author uses a table to summarize the main points.) ）

The mishap of one or two articles

The so-called "mishap" is to use the basic factual error, or the toe-head to consider all the errors can be found. Take a look at "Fu Oral history: I am not Lin Biao" in the article of the mishap:

1, Mao, Liu, Lin's analogy is not appropriate: The article will Zhou 祎 metaphor for Mao, the fu to Liu or Lin. Although some of Mao's character is similar to Zhou's, it is not appropriate to compare political figures with the characters in the market. This article attempts to let the public regard Fu as Liu, but don't forget, Liu is not an absolute positive image, for example, in three years of natural disasters, Liu made a mistake.

2, the white allusion: The article tells a historical allusion, namely the Warring States period white up "not sick" story, and historical facts have serious discrepancy. Bai is a famous general in the Warring States period, but it does not matter with Qin Shihuang, the white master is Qin Zhaowang.

Another look at "Fu turnover: from 360 to Tencent Pawn" a text of the mishap:

1, about 360 of the father: the article said "I let Cao Shu to register a series of 360 domain name ... And Fu is in November 05 only to enter the strange Tigers. In this paragraph, the article tries to prove that the brand name of 360 security guards was established before Fu, which proves that Fu is not the father of 360. But know that history of people know that 360 of the earliest domain name is 360safe.com, and through Whois query, the domain name registration time is in May 2006, at this time Fu has entered the job.

2, about the blame Jinshan data fraud: The article said "These two days and the third party data to blow, said what the user billion, I see the rise of Jinshan curve, is in the recent suddenly a steep transition and rise." China's third party data, you know. "In fact, the data cited by 360 companies in public IPO roadshow materials are also from Eric, attacking rivals, but the fire has also burned itself," he said.

The logic of two articles is out of place

The so-called logic, is common sense, or the derivation of facts. Let's take a look at the logic of Fu oral history: I'm not Lin Biao:

1, about the trend of the relationship between Fu and Zhou: there is a paragraph in the article is "However, it is the radical transformation of Zhou, began to put the FU to a key and dangerous position." At the earliest, the search was the odd tiger, and then the search was +360-odd tigers; now, 360 is Qihoo. The position of the FU was suspended. ”

This should be a causal comment, because "now, 360 is the odd tiger", the fruit is "fu position suspended." This is not stand up to scrutiny, according to Common sense, a company a business done, B, c failure, a business owner more welcome attention. So the logical mistake here is that maybe "fu's position hangs" is the real result, but "now, 360 is the odd tiger" should not all the reasons. From the description of the article, comprehensive Chian can be analyzed, FU separation 360 should also be:

1 in the face of the boss week, Fu in dealing with the problem is not tactful, too direct, with the saying that "too tender."

2 There are some other 360 executives to Fu opinion, especially in the case of a single show of 360 business.

2, on the expression of the main earthquake: the article revealed that the meaning of the "fu", can not stand the feet, the reason has been described. "High-power" from the "historical records", referring to "too much credit, so that the status of the monarchy is threatened and the heart has doubts." The author thinks that this word is not very appropriate here. Fu credit, so that weeks feel threatened and have doubts, this is not in line with the strong character of the old week, and Fu as a part-time, how to "shock the Lord"? Therefore, I think, "high" is the fact, but there is no "Earthquake Lord", but Fu and weeks get along with unpleasant, "angry master" more appropriate.

Let's take a look at the logic of Fu's resignation: from 360 treason to Tencent Pawn:

1, on the inside of the 3Q War: The article, Lee tells a very gossip story, the story lacks factual basis, but the conclusion is somewhat sensational-Jinshan is the real behind the 3Q War director. The article lists various signs of the eve of the 3Q war, but there is neither evidence nor logic. This makes this article to reduce a lot of, of course, the article similar to this kind of the situation has many. Crucially, as 360 of the top brass, the 3Q war was the exact opposite of last year's 360 sound, and it was a bit of a sense of credibility.

2, about 360 privacy events: The article has such a paragraph: "More strange is, they said at that time leakage of the mouth, revealed is the data from the 360 server, the problem is, how can Jinshan have 360 server permissions?"??!!! ......”

There is no logical problem here, it is a kind of Li himself put a oolong bar. "Data from the 360 server" is supposed to be "leaked data from the 360 servers taken from Google snapshots". And Lee's a rhetorical question, "Jinshan how there will be 360 server permissions"-the intention is to discredit Fu, alluding to Fu have inside, but what is the situation has been a large number of media reports, this point has not been questioned, Chian here to expose flaws again to make the article credibility discount?

3, about Tanxiaosheng: The article said that the original Yahoo China CTO Tanxiaosheng, Zhou 2008 to dig to 360, "Xiao-sheng find Xu Xian to inquire about the situation, after asking the old weeks feel very bad, so dry company how will have a future?" ”

This description makes life suspect, about Tanxiaosheng this person, I do not know, but can be traced to its resume (Baidu Encyclopedia entry Search "Tanxiaosheng"), the resume shows that tan in 2003 in 3721, after the Yahoo Times also follow Zhou, that is, "Xiao-sheng find Xu Xian to inquire about the situation, after the question that the old week is very bad" , not very common sense. It should be said that by this time, tan and weeks have worked together for 5 years, but also through a third party to inquire about the week? This is clearly contrary to common sense.

Third, the author's analysis of the credibility of the article

After talking about the problems of mishap and logic, I will talk about the author's feelings. To tell you the truth, "Fu Oral history: I am not lin Biao" This article I think the story is accurate, logic is also clearer, but it should only talk about the side of things. We all know that anything is different from the angle of view. The article as "word" is appropriate.

And for "Fu turnover: from 360 to Tencent Pawn" a text, I can directly judge it for fiction. Why do you have this conclusion? Only need one reason: The article will Zhou's character description is simply "very silly very naïve" the type, this and the old week in the industry passes the image really is far away. I remember watching a few Zhou 祎 on the "Boston" program, is almost a very wary, extremely sensitive, ready to alert people. Zhou treat out guests are aggressive, arguing, it is hard to believe that he will be self-destructive in the company management into this situation, is simply 360 of the company's vulnerable groups.

Taking into account the "Fu turnover: from 360 to Tencent Pawn" a specific article, I think, the article deliberately "belittle" the old week, is to make the article look more credible, this is a PR means. But the more it hides, the more it loses objectivity. In addition, there are too many guessing, imagining and emotional passages in the article, and technically rigorous technical engineers should not let these things be written.

Finally use a sentence to sum up these two articles: "Fu Oral History: I am not lin Biao" can be as one-sided opinion, "Fu turnover: from 360 to Tencent Pawn" not enough to adopt the letter.

A comparison between two essays

Source: http://news.ccw.com.cn/internet/htm2011/20111021_951026.shtml