Zong Ning: Free and professional, hammer is not serious

Last night Wang freely and Luo in Youku in the live confrontation, after reading I found the conclusion is that the world's best mobile phone is Apple, the best mobile phone is Samsung, that's all. For the whole debate, I can draw two conclusions that the king's free evaluation is not professional enough, as for the Luo Hammer is not serious, at least through the always a logic is, you say who can do, if this person can't, we can not do it is normal, do you think this serious? Of course, these are not particularly important things, just in the face of this debate or confrontation itself, as a debating person who has won the provincial championship and the best debater, it is incumbent upon us to analyse the problems of both sides so as to put aside the logic traps and emotional skills that lie above the debate and restore the pros and cons of both.

Luo undoubtedly took the initiative of the whole confrontation, the reason is that this debate does not host, so the most basic and fundamental point of the debate "both sides must alternately speak" did not get a good implementation, Wang freely in the age and self-cultivation obviously ate gentleman's loss, so that has been in the passive. But from the factual level, the king freely actually does not have the obvious mishap, just has some unprofessional mistake. And Luo my logic system is very powerful, there are accusations that there is a hint of doubt there is innuendo, although the facts are not too standing, but grasp the momentum, but it is easy to convince people.

Luo actually pointed out that the king is comfortable only three of the mishap, 1 back-clamp battery switch mistakenly think data protection switch. 2 The inner line of the screen may be penetrated. 3 Wang freely do not know the screen energy-saving switch problem. These three questions, although the Wang freely knowledge blind area, but in fact all and the main trough of the evaluation is not strongly related. These three points of knowledge, the main core of the proof point to prove that Wang freely and not professional, in fact, it is true.

Luo the only thing that confirms the problem is that the hammer phone is really brittle, but the explanation given is that it's a priority, and that the apple is fragile when it's just rolled out, so the hammer is brittle. The King felt it was a problem, of course, consumers will think that there is a problem, in order to be beautiful so that the machine can not be durable is any money to buy a mobile phone can not accept, of course, it is worth mentioning, the debate has always been, Luo that the quality control of Apple and Samsung is abnormal, the serious hammer of course can't. Incidentally confirmed the problem is that the camera is a lot of noise at night, that this is the original cameras must be a problem, they can do nothing, not serious.

There are three controversial points, including the evaluation of the sponge insulation problem, mass production machine screen difference, photo white balance problem. Luo's explanation is that Google Nexus 5 is also the use of sponges, so there is no problem, here the comparison of the truth standard is Google Nexus 5. Is this setting up a standard? Google Nexus 5 is also an old-eastern product, why should one of the first Eastern products be used as a standard for other products? Mass Production machine screen difference big explanation is, Luo that except Apple Samsung, no one can do a standard. The king is free to think it is possible. But Luo insists on being at a low level, apparently not seriously enough. Photo white balance and purple edge of the problem, Luo in the official website T.tt/photo do a variety of comparisons, and finally you will find in the hammer website many better than the best mobile phone photos of the old hemisphere.

In general, the point of contention above, in addition to the confirmed, because the objective factors can not do better, in addition to the sponge is the design of the concept of differences, you really can not find a king freely coined or forged slot points, but in the expression of Luo, these slots are rationalized, so from the factual level, Wang freely evaluation of the mishap in addition to the beginning of a few knowledge blind spots outside.

Need to pay attention to is, about the screen placement problem Luo cunning and Wang freely immature, in fact this thing is very simple, Wang freely found the screen difference big problem, and then need a lens to express this problem, and then the choice of this lens is problematic. Luo this vague, Wang freely use problematic placement method to prove that the hammer is a problem, is planted. In fact, such a technique is often present, the king has always said that his standards are diversified, the video is only part of the performance, but Luo thought that the video is all the reasons, is inadequate and problematic.

The following is a comparison of screen differences between different angles. It's not really a big problem.

The rest of the part, you can say is the personal attack part, also can say is the atmosphere constructs the part.

These are mostly, 1 because the king freely accepts several handset manufacturer's investment, therefore is not the independent third party. 2 because the king freely received the hammer evaluation of the money, did not remind the hammer behind the evaluation of the problem, so the professional ethics problems. 3 Wang freely repair the phone's accessories from the source.

In fact, you can easily find that 1 and 2 itself is a conflict, you said that the king freely collected other people's money injustice, and said to the king freely free money or injustice. Nanima giving money is unjust, what do you want to accuse? Wang Xiaobo said that his father's Institute always has such a lovely phenomenon: the original argument is academic, but in fact, we are not arguing about the academic but people, such as not arguing whether carbon can be converted to nitrogen, whether the yield can be over million kilograms, but spent a lot of time arguing that the other side is not the bourgeoisie and reactionaries, By destroying the body and soul of the other, the academic correctness is attained. It was an absurd time, the 560 's, and now it's been 2014 years.

Rui There is a sentence I still quite agree, the world is not the truth, just facts and angles. Wang freely accept the mobile phone industry investment can infer that his video must be unjust? I'm afraid it's just a logical possibility. From the point of view of the truth, Wang freely and not too many factual errors, investors may affect only the angle, from what angle to analyze a fact, I think is a test taker's freedom. As for the last repair of mobile phone accessories from the source, may be the blame for parallel imports even more unreasonable, do I use pirated software, can prove that I eat lunch did not give money? When a debate is divorced from the product itself, rising to ethics and some other morality, it is clearly not a fair debate, but it is easier for people who go out without a face to succeed. A lot of people will say, the debate is really invincible ah, in fact, this kind of no referee of the bickering, there is no need to dispute, Wang freely just lost in his own upbringing better willing to be reasonable, as long as you repeat a word "you are a problem", the estimated victory.

As for the argument in the process, the emergence of a large number of prostitutes ah, bao-ah, ah, this kind of personal attack, in the debate is bound to be sentenced to lose, of course, bickering will not be, many people will feel, Luo good prestige Ah, scold the king freely not mouth. Do you think Stephen Chow's "Nine Chimaguan"?

The confrontation, in general, is a losing situation. Wang freely showed his unprofessional, and Luo exposed himself not seriously. But the king's free evaluation, even if the interpretation of some problems, but the data is solid, and Luo Hammer, then the problem all exist, and the responsibility to the original manufacturers, industrial chain issues, not only shattered their serious feelings, but also proved that the best mobile phone or Apple and Samsung.

Of course, Wang freely 26 years old or have to continue to grow space, as for old Luo and Hammer, hehe. By the way, although I also do not see millet or anything, but I really do not think that Millet has to go to the black hammer is necessary, any domestic manufacturers, in fact, is not necessary. In the position of the hammer, it is obvious that the Apple investment King is free to go black, but he can not get the original Apple accessories.