今天有個兄弟跟我說sql跑得太慢了,讓我看看。sql如下:
SELECT rownum row_num, pv.vendor_name, pha.segment1 po_num, prh.preparer_id, pha.Org_Id, pha.po_header_id, wo.department_code, wo.description oper_seq_desc, to_char(pha.creation_date, 'RRRR-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') enter_date, to_char(pha.approved_date, 'RRRR-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS') approved_date, --cux_public_pkg.get_item_no(wdj.primary_item_id) item_no, we.wip_entity_name FROM PO.po_headers_all pha, APPS.po_vendors pv, PO.po_lines_all pla, PO.po_line_locations_all pll, PO.po_distributions_all pld, PO.po_requisition_headers_all prh, PO.po_requisition_lines_all prl, PO.po_req_distributions_all prd, WIP.wip_discrete_jobs wdj, APPS.BOM_STANDARD_OPERATIONS_V bso, APPS.wip_operations_v wo, WIP.wip_entities we WHERE 1 = 1 AND prl.wip_entity_id = we.wip_entity_id AND pha.po_header_id = pla.po_header_id AND pha.vendor_id = pv.vendor_id AND pll.po_line_id = pla.po_line_id AND pll.po_header_id = pha.po_header_id AND pll.line_location_id = pld.line_location_id AND prd.requisition_line_id = prl.requisition_line_id AND pld.req_distribution_id = prd.distribution_id AND prl.requisition_header_id = prh.requisition_header_id AND prl.wip_entity_id = wdj.wip_entity_id AND prl.wip_entity_id = wo.wip_entity_id AND prl.wip_operation_seq_num = wo.operation_seq_num AND wo.standard_operation_id = bso.STANDARD_OPERATION_ID AND wdj.Organization_Id = /*p_organization_id*/83 AND pha.segment1 >= /*nvl(p_po_num_f, pha.segment1)*/'621337540' AND pha.segment1 <= /*nvl(p_po_num_t, pha.segment1)*/ '621337540' AND nvl(pha.approved_date, SYSDATE + 9999) >= nvl(pha.approved_date, SYSDATE + 9999) AND nvl(pha.approved_date, SYSDATE + 9999) <=nvl(pha.approved_date, SYSDATE + 9999) ORDER BY pha.segment1, pla.line_num;
快速的運用sql三段分拆方法(分享過的) 掃描一下,發現沒問題 (如果不知道的哥們,請自己百度 落落 sql 三段分拆方法)
SQL裡面有個視圖wo 視圖代碼如下:
/*CREATE OR REPLACE VIEW WIP_OPERATIONS_V(row_id, wip_entity_id, operation_seq_num, organization_id, repetitive_schedule_id, last_update_date, last_updated_by, creation_date, created_by, last_update_login, request_id, program_application_id, program_id, program_update_date, operation_sequence_id, standard_operation_id, operation_code, department_id, department_code, location_id, description, scheduled_quantity, quantity_in_queue, quantity_running, quantity_waiting_to_move, quantity_rejected, quantity_scrapped, quantity_completed, first_unit_start_date, first_unit_completion_date, last_unit_start_date, last_unit_completion_date, previous_operation_seq_num, next_operation_seq_num, count_point_type, count_point_flag, autocharge_flag, backflush_flag, minimum_transfer_quantity, date_last_moved, attribute_category, attribute1, attribute2, attribute3, attribute4, attribute5, attribute6, attribute7, attribute8, attribute9, attribute10, attribute11, attribute12, attribute13, attribute14, attribute15, operation_yield, cumulative_scrap_quantity, operation_yield_enabled, operation_completed, shutdown_type, shutdown_type_disp, x_pos, y_pos, long_description, disable_date, recommended, progress_percentage, wsm_bonus_quantity, actual_start_date, actual_completion_date, employee_id, employee_name, lowest_acceptable_yield, check_skill)AS*/SELECT WO.ROWID ROW_ID, WO.WIP_ENTITY_ID, WO.OPERATION_SEQ_NUM, WO.ORGANIZATION_ID, WO.REPETITIVE_SCHEDULE_ID, WO.LAST_UPDATE_DATE, WO.LAST_UPDATED_BY, WO.CREATION_DATE, WO.CREATED_BY, WO.LAST_UPDATE_LOGIN, WO.REQUEST_ID, WO.PROGRAM_APPLICATION_ID, WO.PROGRAM_ID, WO.PROGRAM_UPDATE_DATE, WO.OPERATION_SEQUENCE_ID, WO.STANDARD_OPERATION_ID, BSO.OPERATION_CODE, WO.DEPARTMENT_ID, BD.DEPARTMENT_CODE, BD.LOCATION_ID, WO.DESCRIPTION, WO.SCHEDULED_QUANTITY, DECODE(WO.QUANTITY_IN_QUEUE, 0, NULL, WO.QUANTITY_IN_QUEUE), DECODE(WO.QUANTITY_RUNNING, 0, NULL, WO.QUANTITY_RUNNING), DECODE(WO.QUANTITY_WAITING_TO_MOVE, 0, NULL, WO.QUANTITY_WAITING_TO_MOVE), DECODE(WO.QUANTITY_REJECTED, 0, NULL, WO.QUANTITY_REJECTED), DECODE(WO.QUANTITY_SCRAPPED, 0, NULL, WO.QUANTITY_SCRAPPED), DECODE(WO.QUANTITY_COMPLETED, 0, NULL, WO.QUANTITY_COMPLETED), WO.FIRST_UNIT_START_DATE, WO.FIRST_UNIT_COMPLETION_DATE, WO.LAST_UNIT_START_DATE, WO.LAST_UNIT_COMPLETION_DATE, WO.PREVIOUS_OPERATION_SEQ_NUM, WO.NEXT_OPERATION_SEQ_NUM, WO.COUNT_POINT_TYPE, DECODE(WO.COUNT_POINT_TYPE, 1, 1, 2) "COUNT_POINT_FLAG", DECODE(WO.COUNT_POINT_TYPE, 3, 2, 1) "AUTOCHARGE_FLAG", WO.BACKFLUSH_FLAG, WO.MINIMUM_TRANSFER_QUANTITY, WO.DATE_LAST_MOVED, WO.ATTRIBUTE_CATEGORY, WO.ATTRIBUTE1, WO.ATTRIBUTE2, WO.ATTRIBUTE3, WO.ATTRIBUTE4, WO.ATTRIBUTE5, WO.ATTRIBUTE6, WO.ATTRIBUTE7, WO.ATTRIBUTE8, WO.ATTRIBUTE9, WO.ATTRIBUTE10, WO.ATTRIBUTE11, WO.ATTRIBUTE12, WO.ATTRIBUTE13, WO.ATTRIBUTE14, WO.ATTRIBUTE15, WO.OPERATION_YIELD, WO.CUMULATIVE_SCRAP_QUANTITY, WO.OPERATION_YIELD_ENABLED, NVL(WO.OPERATION_COMPLETED, 'N'), WO.SHUTDOWN_TYPE, LU1.MEANING, WO.X_POS, WO.Y_POS, WO.LONG_DESCRIPTION, WO.DISABLE_DATE, WO.RECOMMENDED, WO.PROGRESS_PERCENTAGE, WO.WSM_BONUS_QUANTITY, WO.ACTUAL_START_DATE, WO.ACTUAL_COMPLETION_DATE, WO.EMPLOYEE_ID, PAP.FULL_NAME, WO.LOWEST_ACCEPTABLE_YIELD, nvl(wo.CHECK_SKILL, 2) CHECK_SKILL FROM BOM_DEPARTMENTS BD, BOM_STANDARD_OPERATIONS BSO, WIP_OPERATIONS WO, MFG_LOOKUPS LU1, PER_ALL_PEOPLE_F PAP WHERE BD.DEPARTMENT_ID = WO.DEPARTMENT_ID AND BSO.STANDARD_OPERATION_ID(+) = WO.STANDARD_OPERATION_ID AND NVL(BSO.OPERATION_TYPE, 1) = 1 AND BSO.LINE_ID IS NULL AND LU1.LOOKUP_TYPE(+) = 'BOM_EAM_SHUTDOWN_TYPE' AND LU1.LOOKUP_CODE(+) = WO.SHUTDOWN_TYPE AND WO.EMPLOYEE_ID = PAP.PERSON_ID(+) ORDER BY WO.OPERATION_SEQ_NUM;
我靠視圖裡面有 ORDER BY ...... 這不是腦殘嗎? 視圖裡面你搞ORDER BY 幹嘛呢,直接在 視圖外面寫order by 呀。
select .... from a, v_b where a.id=b.id;
a 是一個表, v_b 是一個視圖。 v_b 裡面有order by 那麼 v_b 是有序的, v_b 裡面沒order by 那麼v_b 是無序的。
但是最終的 sql 返回結果 有沒有順序 是 在 最外面 搞 order by 對吧。
所以讓 那哥們把視圖裡面的order by 給去掉 ,結果裡面返回結果了。 執行計畫就不 貼了,視圖裡面有 order by 會干擾執行計畫的。
別在視圖裡面搞ORDER BY ,如果有需要 ,請在 外面sql 進行order by。