關於GetTickCount和QueryPerformanceCounter的精度區別

來源:互聯網
上載者:User

其實差別不大,寫了兩個類來測試:

 

class TimeCounter

{

private:

DWORD start;

public:

TimeCounter() {Start();}

void Start(){start = GetTickCount(); }

DWORD Now() 

DWORD end = GetTickCount();

return (end - start); // return miliseconds

}

};

 

 

class HighResolutionTimeCounter

{

LARGE_INTEGER start;

LARGE_INTEGER freq;

public:

HighResolutionTimeCounter() { QueryPerformanceFrequency(&freq); Start();}

void Start() { QueryPerformanceCounter(&start); }

__int64 Now() //  return miliseconds

LARGE_INTEGER end = { 0 };

QueryPerformanceCounter(&end);

return (end.QuadPart - start.QuadPart)*1000 / freq.QuadPart;

}

};

 

測試代碼 :

TimeCounter tc;

HighResolutionTimeCounter hrtc;

 

Sleep(10*1000);

 

cout << tc.Now() << endl;

cout << hrtc.Now() <<endl;

 

最後得到的結果的區別是很小的。

 

 

 

聯繫我們

該頁面正文內容均來源於網絡整理,並不代表阿里雲官方的觀點,該頁面所提到的產品和服務也與阿里云無關,如果該頁面內容對您造成了困擾,歡迎寫郵件給我們,收到郵件我們將在5個工作日內處理。

如果您發現本社區中有涉嫌抄襲的內容,歡迎發送郵件至: info-contact@alibabacloud.com 進行舉報並提供相關證據,工作人員會在 5 個工作天內聯絡您,一經查實,本站將立刻刪除涉嫌侵權內容。

A Free Trial That Lets You Build Big!

Start building with 50+ products and up to 12 months usage for Elastic Compute Service

  • Sales Support

    1 on 1 presale consultation

  • After-Sales Support

    24/7 Technical Support 6 Free Tickets per Quarter Faster Response

  • Alibaba Cloud offers highly flexible support services tailored to meet your exact needs.