[java]spring幾種remoting調用的測試結果：

1000 loop test:

testDirectAccountService:10     ---direct java call
testDirectAccountServiceR:20
testAccountService:40  ---factory.getBean(xxx)
testAccountServiceR:40
testRMIAccountService:7711 ---normal object's rmi service
testRMIAccountServiceR:1402  ---Remote object's rmi service
testAccountServiceHessian:4637 ---normal object's hessian service
testAccountServiceBurlap:3726 ---normal object's hessian service
testAccountServiceHttpinvoker:16744 ---normal object's hessian service

rev：1.1rc2
cpu：賽揚450
ram：312M

傳統的Remote介面RMI Servie最快，也比較麻煩，需要stub．重大優點：支援回調
新推出的http invoker令人失望．
RMI封裝調用普通對象成了雞肋．
基於http+xml的burlap出人意料的比http+序列化的hessian要快．

看樣，如果Romote介面被頻繁調用推薦用傳統RMI
如果希望基於http，不需要實現remote介面，推薦用caucho的burlap.

測試代碼：
http://files.cnblogs.com/steeven/spring-remoting-test.rar