andrew ng education

When should do we use fine-tuning?It is typically used only if you have a large labeled training set; In this setting, fine-tuning can significantly improve the performance of your classifier. However, if you had a large unlabeled dataset (for unsupervised feature learning/pre-training) and only a relatively smal L labeled training Set, then fine-tuning was significantly less likely to help.Stacked Autoencoders (Training):Equivalent to capturing the characteristics of an input set with multiple

function and the derivation of each parameter when using it. we implement the costfunction ourselves and pass in the response parameter. We can return the following two values at a time: For example, call the fminunc () function and use @ to input the pointer to the costfunction function. For the initialized Theta, you can also add options (gradobj = on indicates "Open the gradient target parameter ", that is, we will provide gradient parameters for this function ): 6.7 multi-category classifi

endfunction Initializes the matrix for the preceding dataset. Call a function to calculate the value of the cost function. 1> X = [1 1; 1 2; 1 3]; 2> Y = [1; 2; 3]; 3> Theta = [0; 1]; % records is 0, 1 h (x) = x. The value of the cost function is 04> J = costfunctionj (X, Y, theta) 5 J = 0. 1> Theta = [0; 0]; % values is 0, 0 h (x) = 0. data cannot be fitted at this time. 2> J = costfunctionj (X, Y, theta) 3 J = 2.33334 5> (1 ^ 2 + 2 ^ 2 + 3 ^ 2)/(2*3) % value of the cost function 6 ans = 2

problem of the original problem. Relative to the original problem is only the change of the order of Min and Max, here to take the equal sign. Conditions such as the following descriptive narrations:① If a constrained inequality GI is a convex (convex) function (a linear function belongs to a convex function)② constrained equation hi are affine (affine) functions (Shaped like H (w) =wtx+b)③ and exists W makes for all I,gi (W) In these if, there must be ω?,α?,β, so that Omega is the solution of

)/m; at End - End - -%size (J,1) -%size (J,2) - ind3 = A3-Ty; -D2 = (D3 * THETA2 (:,2: End)). *sigmoidgradient (z2); toTheta1_grad = Theta1_grad + d2'*a1/m; +Theta2_grad = Theta2_grad + d3'*a2/m; - the% ------------------------------------------------------------- *jj=0; $ Panax Notoginseng forI=1: Size (Theta1,1) - forj=2: Size (Theta1,2) theJJ = JJ + Theta1 (i,j) *theta1 (i,j) *lambda/(m*2); + End A End theSize (Theta1,1); +Size (Theta1,2); - $ forI=1: Size (THETA2,1) $

-validation approach. Cross-validation A simple idea to solve the above model selection problem is that I use 70% of the data to train each model, with 30% of the data for training error calculation, and then we compare the training errors of each model, we can choose the training error is relatively small model. If you do not refer to these errors (learn the theory of experience risk minimization--andrew ng